20%?
you have to look at which budget.
if you have a spread sheet with all budget items and did a percentage of what was just wasted money, you'd find that some of the items are just give aways.
20%?
you have to look at which budget.
if you have a spread sheet with all budget items and did a percentage of what was just wasted money, you'd find that some of the items are just give aways.
your imprecise list conflicts with other lists.
you want to label people based upon Time/Warner publishing demography mongering to make sales to advertisers.
your imprecise list doesn't consider the individual. Some say Gen X pepole can be 5 years older than what you show.
all of that stuff is loose.
It's not supposed to be used in a non general way.
It is about 'archtypes' or 'marketting demographics'.
It speaks nothing about the individual.
If people use the words I'll listen to what they say. After I hear it I'll maybe stear the conversation to the imprecision of such words, and their use as Marketting tools. To speak about real people with them is grotesque in a lot of ways.
but if it's insulting to them to tell them 'by the way, I don't use those terms', then maybe I'll be mum about it, and let them go on.
Even though they use words and terms I don't like doesn't mean that they don't have important things to say.
you are a day later.
So the Climate-hypocrites elitest Summer-BAAL rave is still going on in Sicily?
I am sure the locals are not impressed.