Anonymous ID: 4a49a8 Aug. 2, 2019, 6:59 a.m. No.7308753   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7308450

20%?

you have to look at which budget.

if you have a spread sheet with all budget items and did a percentage of what was just wasted money, you'd find that some of the items are just give aways.

Anonymous ID: 4a49a8 Aug. 2, 2019, 7:01 a.m. No.7308777   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8803 >>8811

>>7308758

your imprecise list conflicts with other lists.

you want to label people based upon Time/Warner publishing demography mongering to make sales to advertisers.

your imprecise list doesn't consider the individual. Some say Gen X pepole can be 5 years older than what you show.

Anonymous ID: 4a49a8 Aug. 2, 2019, 7:05 a.m. No.7308820   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7308803

all of that stuff is loose.

It's not supposed to be used in a non general way.

It is about 'archtypes' or 'marketting demographics'.

It speaks nothing about the individual.

Anonymous ID: 4a49a8 Aug. 2, 2019, 7:17 a.m. No.7308907   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7308811

If people use the words I'll listen to what they say. After I hear it I'll maybe stear the conversation to the imprecision of such words, and their use as Marketting tools. To speak about real people with them is grotesque in a lot of ways.

but if it's insulting to them to tell them 'by the way, I don't use those terms', then maybe I'll be mum about it, and let them go on.

Even though they use words and terms I don't like doesn't mean that they don't have important things to say.