Anonymous ID: 48c600 March 20, 2018, 7:44 a.m. No.731775   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1802 >>1889

>>731752

Cambridge is a Robert Mercer thing. They're blowing it up thinking they're going to get Trump with it, but you can't address that without also addressing the rest of the social media problems. Which means they lose, bigly because their social media fuckery is worth a million times more to them than comparatively insignificant bit that Trump is associated with.

Anonymous ID: 48c600 March 20, 2018, 8:05 a.m. No.731916   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1996

>>731889

Yeah, doing all that from the outside with a consulting firm like cambridge is tiddlywinks compared to what's been done by social networks themselves in cahoots with the clowns and their preferred political candidates ie. hilldog and hussein.

Anonymous ID: 48c600 March 20, 2018, 8:16 a.m. No.731994   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Brad Parscale:

"โ€œThe only collaboration I am aware of in the Trump digital campaign was with staff provided to the campaign by Facebook, Google and Twitter,โ€ he added. โ€œThose experts in digital marketing worked side-by-side with our teams from Giles-Parscale, the Republican National Committee, and Cambridge Analytica to run a professional and winning campaign.โ€

 

www.politico.com/story/2017/07/14/brad-parscale-trump-digital-house-intel-committee-240557