It's a signal that a new phase is on the menu.
>Oh, then by all means, please explain it to this simpleton.
>You guys want to explain things to "normies" but chase out anyone new here ….smh..
Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.
Q.
>But we've also been under heavy attack for the last 2 weeks as well some Vet Anons are a bit prickly
The 1000 yard stare is a thing on all battle grounds, anon. Some of us have seen the recent rash of clown shit 3 or 4 times already..
That's because there is a big difference between Q's statement of "future proves past"'' vs A clown ploy of "oh gee I'm gonna try to read these drops like tea leaves, and fix the data around the policy ''as if its a prophecy'!!"
The Q policy is sound. The clown ploy is a trap..
Follow the Q policy of linking present digs to past drops, instead of the clown policy of making shit up as one goes along.
Trying to read future events from drops is misusing the information, and will fail, every time.
And more: The findings concerning the clowns, the bots, and their ways are being re-posted more for new visitors, so they don't get suckered into wasting their time. Hardened anons ''should already know all this shit, but we get new visitors all the time, so deal with it.''
How to Quickly Spot a Clown:
– Attempting to get a divisive or emotional knee-jerk trigger response from (you) to derail research is a red flag.
– Concern trolling and copy/pasta spam shilling that contradicts confirmed findings is another red flag.
– Employing faux debate tactics: Generalizations, gas-lighting, misdirection, false equivalences, confusing correlation with causality, appeal to authority, transference, false precepts, personal attacks, straw-men, red herrings, etc. are all yet another red flag.
– Promoting social ethics that are disingenuous, such as doxxing anyone, "reverse psychology" ploys or ones based on lying to the American People; These are obvious red flags.
– Promoting tactics that are unethical, illegal or involve violence outside the scope of the Law are huge red flags.
– Employing Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt tactics for any reason is highly suspicious.
This is just a subset of the disinformation tactics employed. A complete write-up is available here: https:// vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-25-rules-of-disinformation/
How to spot a Clown's bot
– NEVER KNOWINGLY ENGAGE A CLOWN OR BOT DIRECTLY. It just wastes bread with their responses, and hands them a target to lock on to. If you suspect a clown or bot is trying to engage (you), the countermeasures will force the wrangler to earn it, which usually outs them; They are lazy.
– It seems that the easiest way to get a bot wrangler to give their (you) to you is to fuck with the bots by proxy, either by copy/pasting the user's ID as a quoted reference instead of tagging its actual post link in your response, or by answering it with text in an image (or both) until they start fucking up because they can't lock onto a target phrase correctly.. Doing this can also make the bots look artificially erratic, and easier for other anons to spot. It also makes it so the wranglers HAVE TO engage.
What we know about the cl0wnbots
– Require a handler to watch for, target, and be in the thread
– Can not enter threads themselves
– Can pick up random or contradictory meme flags
– Consist of multiple bots that respond to posts and each other, and can create posts
– Appear to activate on lists of trigger words; these can change over time
– Use a combination of legit pasta, pre-written points, or spam targeted at sliding the thread
– Have unwittingly pasta'd supportive posts
– Are employed mostly at night and on weekends (US time)
– Add to bump limits
– Can be filtered by ID once they are observed
– Are not perfected and can be easily spotted
– Were tested briefly prior to being deployed starting on the /CBTS/ boards
– Have certain flaws that can cause them to misfire in sometimes comical ways
– The handlers can make bogus clown threads, but also can be confused by accidental ones
– Handlers, as of now, cannot access the servers
– Have still not succeeded in their mission
– Still can't meme
– Still can't meme
>The most likely scenario is simply the news sites are spoofing the date to come up in a search at the top of the list
I disagree with this from a recod keeping standpoint.
It would have been picked up by even normies by now if they did that on the reg.
I'm not buying your justification.
>Reports say Cambridge Analytica is tied to Trump campaign. That isnt good, but we also know this is part of the plan and not to worry
I get the strong impression that this will come out to be part of the sting. Fake news sting and election fraud sting and oh my so many glorious stings…