>>731275

Just wanted to let you know you're not alone in your thinking. When you start to ask, or heaven help us, express any uncertainty as to meaning, the attack squad comes out. It's the same behavior in a cult. Don't attack dear leader!

I've been here since late last year…open supporter of current administration but I can't point out that writing 'boom' three different ways is a bit lacking?

There's a notable correlation between staff shake-ups and Q posts having less material information. Today was another hit piece - this time about Scavino's x-wife.

I'm willing to take the hit…shill blowback to this post will be fierce but I ask again:

What is the specific timeframe for the IG's report? For months I have been told indictments cannot come, at the risk of appearing like political retribution, until Horowitz's report gives the players the necessary cover. Fine, but then it never drops. Hope I'm wrong, but it gets a bit old reading Brennan, Holder and Comey blow us kisses while Hillary and Huma vay-cay overseas.

>>731297

Hey dick-munch. I realize it must get frustrating having a superior intellect but next time post your own fucking mug online. Where do you get off posting baby pictures? Fucking grade-A little bitch. Classy.

>>731474

I'm sorry, did I hurt your feelings? If you have something to say, say it. Was there something in my post you disagree with?

>>731493

Nice try Clown. It would have taken half the effort to run that question through a search engine if you were honestly asking. Take your act back to Cirque du Soleil…or try harder next time.

And condolences to the performer who just died.

>>731514

Appreciate the honesty anon. Afraid I'm close myself.

>>731518

No worries mate. Water off my back and all. But please, do tell, what exactly have I said that leaves you with that impression? Or are you actually saying there was nothing wrong with the prick posting 50 pictures of innocent children on this board? Would have though you understood how most of the people here feel in that regard. I think you're confused…the NAMBLA sign-up sheet is down the hall to your right. This is a watering hole for freedom-loving Patriots, not those who get excited spamming baby pictures. Yeah, and I'm the wanker….thanks for playing though.

>>731449

Yes. I fear the same thing. To make it worse now I'm hearing that the IG is part of the SES. If true, that's worrisome as most are put in their spots to support the deep state in its effort to prevent progress (maintain the status quo). Really hope I'm wrong, for if it's a nothing-burger I'm out of things to hang my hope on.

>>731458

Yep. I hope it's only a small portion of those here, aided by Clowns and useful idiots. The most patriotic thing we can do is be asking critical questions. Vagueness only goes so far. In law, many laws are struck down as being "void for vagueness." The time for a little more clarity has long passed, and those pretending otherwise are only fooling themselves. Nobodody is arguing for the release of classified material, only the use of clear and unambiguous terminology…every now and then. Otherwise any interpretation can fit and any true insight can be dismissed, which is self-defeating when asking people to dig.

>>731705

Thanks anon. Will take a look. And a well said and reasoned approach. Here's hoping.