Side by side on Ratcliff withdrawing from becoming DNI
Red: Dates
Blue: Ratcliff would be a great DNI
Green: Sleepers and Ratcliff withdrawing
Q posts "Racliff good" and a link to the video of Whitaker saying Ratcliff and Barr would make a great team on the July 29th; also adding that "sleepers" (deep state within the intelligence community) "present problems" with filling positions. Then today, August 2nd, POTUS announces he will withdraw from becoming DNI.
It seems likely these "sleepers" threatened Ratcliff somehow or impacted his nomination process in some way, which POTUS possibly hints to by saying it is about "him and his family [having] to deal with these people" (these people = sleepers in media and the intel community).
I'm sure POTUS will find a great DNI, but this seems like fuckery.
It's possible. Wikipedia says "Ratcliffe and his wife, Michele, live with their two daughters in Heath, Texas." It could be the sleepers lobbied against him too. But this is the "intel community"..
I'm not sure anon, I think Ratcliff and Barr would've made a genuinely good team.
Ratcliff would've had to serve, at least Sacarmucci served for 11 days.
>wut's
You used the proper grammar, but a misspelling.
You made grammarnazis happy, but spellingnazis mad.
>You obviously don't know God.
<?
>What does Q say about God?
<?
>Did Q say to read the Bible?
<?
>This is a Q research board.
<?
>You shut the fuck up.
You're legitimately mentally ill, spammer.
Seek professional help and you can feel better.
Unironically.
Yes. It'd be government-tech induced mental illness. Get off the internet and go see a doctor.
I'm serious though, that spammer is retarded.