With POTUS bringing up Libel & Slander again, reminder that there has GOT to be a way to expose the MSM as the Controlled Fraud it is. Problem is, SO much being suppressed online now. Aside from the Communists having achieved almost all their goals (see 1/10/1963 Congressional Record), am still looking for when MSM ’news’ media was officially classified as “Entertainment”, similar to Vince McMahon calling his programs ‘WWE’ (Wildlife people aside, he still named it “Entertainment”).

There HAS to be something, somewhere, specifying this because MSM sewage does not even RESEMBLE “news” reporting, and there is apparently ZERO consequence for outright/blatant Libel & Slander.

Obviously, MSM is held to NONE of this:

-2005 Washington Revised Code RCW 9.58.030: Publication defined.

Any method by which matter charged as libelous may be communicated to another shall be deemed a publication thereof. 
[1909 c 249 § 174; Code 1881 § 1234; 1869 p 384 § 5; RRS § 2426.]

-2005 Washington Revised Code RCW 9.58.010: Libel, what constitutes.

Every malicious publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, sign[,] radio broadcasting or which shall in any other manner transmit the human voice or reproduce the same from records or other appliances or means, which shall tend:    (1) To expose any living person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or to deprive him of the benefit of public confidence or social intercourse; or

(2) To expose the memory of one deceased to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy; or

(3) To injure any person, corporation or association of persons in his or their business or occupation, shall be libel. Every person who publishes a libel shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. [1935 c 117 § 1; 1909 c 249 § 172; 1891 c 69 § 3; Code 1881 §§ 1230, 1231; 1879 p 144 § 1; 1869 p 383 §§ 1, 2; RRS § 2424.]

-2005 Washington Revised Code RCW 9.58.040: Liability of editors and others.

▪ …That in any prosecution or action for libel it shall be an absolute defense if the defendant shows that the matter complained of was published without his knowledge or fault and against his wishes by another who had no authority from him to make such publication and was promptly retracted by the defendant with an equal degree of publicity upon written request of the complainant. 
[1935 c 117 § 2; 1909 c 249 § 175; Code 1881 §§ 1230, 1231; 1879 p 144 § 1; 1869 p 383 §§ 1, 2; RRS § 2427.]

▪

▪ Then there’s Smith-Mundt repealed by the Treasonous Kenyan:

▪ U.S. Repeals Propaganda Ban, Spreads Government-Made News to Americans

▪ For decades, a so-called anti-propaganda law prevented the U.S. government's mammoth broadcasting arm from delivering programming to American audiences. JULY 14, 2013 https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/