>"don't filter" copypasta
>This is a dribbling idiot
Sadly, I have to agree. I used to kind of like anime faggot, but now all he does is spam copypasta like some kind of finkelstein faggot. I'm really disappointed.
When dat sealed proceeding gets revealed to be your indictment
>Why so much attention, I'm just advertising for no censorship.
Because you're spamming copypasta, anon. It's lazy and disingenuous. If you want to discourage people from filtering–and I don't really think anyone needs you to do that, mind you–you could at least take the time to make a well-reasoned original post on that subject now and then that makes it clear you aren't being a fucking net nanny who sounds like she's pushing some kind of agenda.
Anything said via copypasta is easily disregarded as background noise and creates the question in my mind "Who's taking the time to spam this fucking thing every bread, and why? How can anyone achieve this level of coverage and consistency, and why?" It makes you come across as not-a-normal-person-or-poster. I shudder to use the word "shill", because I severely doubt you are a shill and find screaming "shill!" to be yet another lazy and disingenuous tactic, but it's suspicious as fuck.
Your copypasta on filtering uses a number of tired and shitty board tropes including (((echoes))), the "imagine doing x" trope, "top kek", and then goes on to label everyone who suggests filtering as a shill (tired, lazy, disingenuous, and probably wrong), and ascribes made up motives to them as a collective (though they probably aren't even connected), and then states that people posting "porn spam" are (((them))). Even I "spam" a fair bit of porn here, so what exactly are you trying to say? Porn has been a part of this board since inception, to keep up morale and provide a limited and enjoyable distraction.
In short, it's a lazy, divisive, nannying post full of cringey forced memes that comes across as intentionally obnoxious, so you really shouldn't be surprised by how many people get triggered by it and filter you. If this copypasta is your idea of trolling, I can only ask how fucked up is you is, nigga. If not, I recommend you give up on this spam, it's shitty and ineffective and ultimately no one really needs your overbearing hand-holding.
>Giants in old days. True or false?
They're still around. One such population lives in the caves in the middle east and certain parts of anatolia.
>big change in the neck
And the earlobes, forehead creases, location of moles, teeth, shape of chin, jawline
Honestly, this image does a very poor comparison since the "2019" images are so blurry and backlit; there are much better images contrasting these two men. The new Joe ("Bidan") looks like Joe Biden very little. Only major details are correct–all the minor details are wrong.
>With 4 points you can create two circles.
A circle can be defined by 2 points–one being the center and one being a point along the circumference. With 4 points, you can define more than 2 circles. I am not smart enough to know exactly how many, but my best guess is, each pair of 2 points can make 2 circles, so with 4 points you can make 16 circles (2^4)
>is using some sort of tech (tinnitus tone
>online gangstalking and alot worse)
Tell me about the online gangstalking, anon.
>You're bringing out all the dumb shill slides tonight, aren't you.
No. But you're bringing out the ad hominem attacks without discussing the material like a typical boomer, hmmm. Are you really this low-brow, or are you just faking it due to laziness?
>Please stop with this - he had a facelift ffs!!
That could account for a handful of the differences but not all of them. Not in my opinion, anyway. Shrug. Maybe we'll never know.
>It's a clone.
I haven't been able to force that redpill down my throat yet. Not sure if I believe they maintain a bunch of clones of important people, nor will I until I see some evidence of the facility where it's done or catch two copies in the same place or different places at the same time or SOMETHING. Sure, I have my suspicions, but nothing concrete enough to overcome skepticism. Like, there are definitely 2 Hillary Clintons (many anons have posted comparison pictures showing what is obviously two different women) but that's explained by the deep vein thrombosis in her legs which makes air travel potentially lethal for her. In order to keep up with modern politics as a person who could die of a stroke if she flew on a plane, she needs someone to make all the public appearances she can't possibly get to in time as a result of her absolutely horrible health. I don't think it's a clone, just an actor.
>Best President ever!
They're going to have to ask the Q sooner or later. This is the 3rd or 4th time lately we've seen a "president retweets Q follower" story.
>Holy Christmas Batman, don't dig any further.
You can get past cloning without being decided on whether it's real or not and move on to other subjects successfully, don't worry. I just eat lots of toothpaste to get my fluoride levels where they need to be.
>Can't you explain what would be the purpose of "asking the Q question" or "forcing the Q question"
>It never made sense to me.
Right now, Q exists in a quantum state of being simultaneously real and fake. Asking the Q collapses the quantum waveform, either partially or completely. It means POTUS either confirms or denies Q, or that he demurs and doesn't answer the question. Whichever of those results occur, the needle on the record stops going in circles and the next tracks begins to play.
>they really don't. naming Q could cause harm to them & families.
He would never name Q, and that's not necessarily what the Q is. The Q is "What is Q" not "Who is Q", or so I believe. The important thing is asking POTUS on camera what is his opinion of what Q is, is it real, is it fake, is it good, is it bad. That hasn't happened yet despite Q being around for quite a while and being attacked by numerous media outlets. Many of us here believe that if Q were fake, POTUS would watch our backs by calling it out, but I personally think the Q movement has the greatest value to POTUS when it is simultaneously real and fake. There are benefits to both; once POTUS confirms one way or the other, the benefits shrink as well, and new challenges or liabilities arise, too. If Q is real, Democrats and leftists go ape-shit. If Q is fake, Republicans and patriots who have kept their anger simmering while waiting for the plan to pan out will suddenly start to boil because shit is no longer "happening." POTUS doesn't want to deal with either event occurring; shit will get harder in either case.
Q is a babysitting tool that's preventing a huge amount of civil unrest from destroying this country. That's not to say that Q is not real–just to say that one of his functions is to keep us all from butchering each other.