dChan
Anonymous ID: c97628 Aug. 3, 2019, 1:33 a.m. No.7319936   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9971 >>0013

>>7319692 pb

"forcing to prove every post made"

Now that makes sense, it would force the exploration of the material in greater detail. So it would foil their cover-up attempts and all fronts of their chicanery.

 

thanks.

What puzzled me was:

"Isn't the whole point of "Q" that POTUS could retain deniability?

So for me, I thought keeping it quiet would be safer for POTUS.

However, perhaps the ones who want to kill him know already?

"They know this is real"

So the only ones in the dark are the public, anyway.

The ones who would harm POTUS if the material was surfaced? Hey, they already know.

The whole "hate Q 'conspiracy theorists'" is the same ol' dumb ploy by the perps and their follower-stooges which has gone on for 50 years, at least since the JFK murder.

 

THIS IS VERY HISTORIC

Hail Anons!

Anonymous ID: c97628 Aug. 3, 2019, 1:51 a.m. No.7320013   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0032

>>7319936

>>7319704 pb

Yes, so many possibilities.

Most obvious one is they Mass Media just doesn't cover it; which is so far what has gone on, except for the hit pieces.

If POTUS publicly denies "Q" then it's the status quo which remains.

If POTUS endorses "Q" all hell breaks loose.

and Yes, there has to be the proper environment for that ; such as

1 . declass , unredact ?

  1. opposition shown to be in bad faith, faulty

  2. TIME : people have to have the time to resolve the contradictions, given they that already whole-hearted believe without question everything the Legacy Media tells them.

 

Maybe there should be a "predictive Programming" movie that prepares people mentally? For instance, where the public are completely controlled by a lying Media.

I know "Matrix" was made; but a variation with journalists as the central actors?

>>7319728 pb

Yes, I think the reply above >>7319704 was a good explanation.

You don't need declass / unredact to prove the "Q" details - since much was already proved open source. That's the point. It's not hidden. "You have everything" already.

 

>>7319971

^^ hatch act violations / Pelosi

I didn't follow this, but it makes sense.

"inviting inspection of the evidence" Yep. That would be a motive to block the "Q" question.

Anonymous ID: c97628 Aug. 3, 2019, 1:59 a.m. No.7320032   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0044 >>0082

>>7320013

"Maybe there should be a "predictive Programming" movie that prepares people mentally? For instance, where the public are completely controlled by a lying Media."

 

It could be a satire / comedy like used to be made in the 60's, every so often on serious subjects?

PAGING Randy Quaid? Q - AID and his wife the film maker? Evie?

If Q-team workers took over film making?

Now that would really "bake their noodle?"

Anonymous ID: c97628 Aug. 3, 2019, 2:02 a.m. No.7320038   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7320029

yeah, they DS has huge shill teams on here.

When you realize the extent of it, it's truly amazing.

One night they all surfaced together to oppose something [forget what at the moment] and it was the "Aha" moment..

"Too many of (you) fuck-heads. Really"

Anonymous ID: c97628 Aug. 3, 2019, 2:05 a.m. No.7320051   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0052

>>7320037

See what I mean.

One of them is getting "creative"

They rise to the surface of the swamp water.

And different things can trigger it.

If you write something really good, they all jump and verify what you just wrote.

funny, real anons are more reflective - and have no motive to "jump" all at once.