>>7320811

Barr's comments are optics. Discerning anons know this already. Barr cannot say anything to prejudge the case in the public's eye. His statements presume, for public consumption, a limited scope of facts.

He has to take this stance as a neutral AG. Take another survey of the landscape once the IG comes out…and the evidence of TREASON become front and center.

Do not miss the bigger picture. If treason was committed, then EVERYTHING these people did is evidence of it…the leaks, the FISA abuse, etc…all of it….you don't need multiple charges detailing the constituent acts that make up the whole, you only need the whole. Treason is punishable by death, and these assholes conspired with foreign agents and dignitaries to overthrow the election.

Barr can't say anything that hints of this prematurely.

PATIENCE

>>7320981

He's a shill, anon.

>>7320984

No….understand real wages vs. nominal wages. A better measure of inflation is real wages. When real wages (read: purchasing power) go up, then we are not suffering from inflationary effects. Real wages are rising right now.

Late 19th century - nominal wages fell and yet real wages went up at the same time. This meant people earned less but were able to buy more. A casual, uninformed observer calls this devastating deflation, but it didn't matter, because the economy was so much more productive. People were better off despite the lower wages.