Anonymous ID: a877c4 Aug. 3, 2019, 9:40 a.m. No.7322628   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2640

>>7322603

>a free energy receiverโ€ฆ

This lacks all descriptive information. Please elaborate with at least some information related to how such a device would work to deliver "FREE ENERGY".

 

>Tesla was going to use one of these, or several, to power the world's fair in chicago. JP Morgan got wind of it and put the kaibosh on it. not long after Tesla lost his backing and what not.

You are aware of misinformation, correct? Without a description of how such device work, I call 100% bullshit.

 

>Think of it as a toroid winding and by the insertion of an appropriate conductor you can draw juice to power thingsโ€ฆ

Once again, this is bullshit unless you offer information that makes sense. A toroid is just a geometry. What does it do? how does it work? Why does it work?

 

So far, you're batting 0.

Anonymous ID: a877c4 Aug. 3, 2019, 9:48 a.m. No.7322708   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2743 >>2771

People claiming a connection between Tesla and free energy need to define how such "FREE ENERGY" works. Otherwise, they're just blind faith followers with no actual knowledge. That kind of blind follower is very dangerous to anyone who values credibility.

 

Note: I believe there is technology that can deliver [nearly] free energy for all at a very, very cheap cost (relatively). However, I do not believe Tesla was the main discoverer of this technology. Tesla was a genius who should be honored, but I don't think he's the guy who cracked the nut of the technology I am referring to. (And yes, I believe I understand how this extremely cheap energy technology works.)

 

I responded to two people above claiming things about Tesla and free energy. The fact that I haven't gotten a reasonable response should tell everyone here what I'm talking about. Crickets.

 

Don't say shit unless you can back it up. If you're promoting a hunch, say so.

Anonymous ID: a877c4 Aug. 3, 2019, 9:56 a.m. No.7322785   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2946

>>7322743

>https://electricitybook.com/tesla-writings/tesla-inventions.pdf

Publication date is 1894, which is before Tesla's ball lightning research and Wardynclyffe. Just sayin', based on my other research, this is good stuff, but not related to any revolutionary energy generation.

Anonymous ID: a877c4 Aug. 3, 2019, 10:17 a.m. No.7322992   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7322946

>Not free and not seriously significant in todays modern world in terms of global power consumption.

This is what I was getting at. The disinformation specialists are trying to discredit us by trying to get us to spout relative nonsense.

 

>and this is why Wardenclyffe doesn't look like a normal antenna.

I believe this is incorrect. I do not believe Wardenclyffe had anything to do with wireless power transmission; I believe it was a ball lightning power generator โ€“ essentially a fusion reactor. You can see this if you compare Wardenclyffe diagrams to the schematic of the Lawrenceville Plasma Physics fusion reactor (look it up) and replace the LPP physical electrode with Wardenclyffe's antenna semisphere at the top.

 

In any case, Wardenclyffe definitely has nothing to do with waveguides. If you assert that it does, please show where the waveguide is in any Wardenclyffe diagram.

 

Also, if Wardenclyffe has anything to do with power transmission, please explain where the receiver(s) were for the testing that was done at Wardenclyffe. Obviously, they would be testing power transmission, correct? Where would the receiver be?