Anonymous ID: 65d755 Aug. 3, 2019, 1:47 p.m. No.7325848   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7324520

♦ This manifesto is written by an Anarchist.

♦ This Anarchist is most likely a Facebook frequent poster in Anarchist groups looking to add to The Anarchist Library ( Cookbook )

♦ The essay style is militant and will be mimicked everywhere he submitted his writing for consideration to add.

♦ This anarchist wants attention and his works published, even though it is mediocre quality writing. He finds it superior.

♦ The biggest motivation is progressing the anarchist movement and nothing of anything else he says.

 

NOW LET'S BREAK DOWN THIS ESSAY

♦ ME ME ME ME ME ME ALL ABOUT ME is beginning and end. Sandwiched in between is the meat ( this guy chose Bologna as his meat )

♦ In the 1st paragraph, this guy says "My motives for this attack are not personal." yet the portions titled about him personally have 58 lines and all of his reasoning has 64 lines. Within the 64 lines includes about 6 lines towards the end of his 'reasons' that are all about his opinion. The remaining lines are about his gun choice. For something that was not personal at all, it sure interjects him personally a lot. Over half the essay is about him.

♦ He states he could write a 10 page essay on all the damage these corporations have caused ( again giving power to the effectiveness of his writing )

♦ The visions of Civil Unrest seen in his paragraph Economic Reasons is typical Anarchist fantasies & writings.

♦ In his Gear paragraph, he states he didn't spend much time preparing for the attack. Maybe a month, probably less. ( He is specific on all details up util now. He is non committal about timing and that is the 1 detail he alone would have solid knowledge of and not this theoretical Bologna he is writing, yet he is unsure of how much time he spent. Those 2 things are inconsistent. Detail oriented in facts contained in an informative essay yet sloppy on what he has personal knowledge of? Yeah right buddy! )

♦ False Hubble bragging is not his style so why on the last line of the Gear section does he do it? He clearly values his writing all the way through this except for the 1 line. Within that 1 line he reminds us of how valuable his writing is to the World by saying a meh manifesto is better than no manifesto.

♦The Reaction paragraph has a voting block spelled bloc. Both are correct but his use of bloc instead of block suggests he has written it many times this way for paper submission. It is familiar and common use to him most likely through Black Bloc and not a common thought of categories of voting blocks.

I'm going to study the last paragraph for a while to find the inconsistencies with the rest of the essay because it was an after thought. This essay most likely, was parts of other papers he has turned in before. The last paragraph is unusually long considering he said this was not personal.