TRUST WRAY, TRUST HASPEL, TRUST KUSHNER, TRUST DERSHOWITZ, TRUST POTUS, TRUST Q, TRUST NSA
What does it say about POTUS, Q, WRAY, HASPEL, that after 3 years, they are still incapable of protecting us?
We need Q followers to sign up for these crisis actor roles, that way we can get the inside scoop lol
The founding fathers were Enlightenment humanists. That underlying principle (that all humans are rational creatures) is the basis of our government itself
And if you see evidence that someone was killed?
You think nobody was killed at Las Vegas? Or at that high school in Florida?
You think every hospital in these regions, every EMT/Paramedic, every nurse/doctor is lying?
It's not specific to the 2nd Amendment, it actually pertains to the entire Constitution
My question is simply, do you believe that everyone is rational and sane enough to be allowed to use firearms? Yes or no?
Is everyone rational or sane enough to use firearms, yes or no?
Should 2nd Amendment rights by allowed for everyone?
It is not specifically enumerated in the Constitution because literally every author of the document believed in it. It was the prevailing philosophy of the time. If you read about the authors of the constitution themselves, this was the whole idea of a having a democracy, that all humans make rational decisions, so they all deserve a right to vote and be treated as rational actors
2nd Amendement was in the bill of rights, which were technically added after the Constitutional convention
And in any case, the question is simply this:
Do you believe that everyone is sane and rational enough to be allowed to use and possess firearms?
If an elderly individual is incapable of driving a motor vehicle responsibly, should they be allowed to continue driving, despite the fact that they are putting themselves and others at risk of harm?
Not confiscate cars from everyone because of a few drunk drivers…but wouldn't it make sense to restrict drunk drivers from being able to drive again??
If a judge says its unconstitutional to have a citizenship question on the US Census, does that automatically mean it is correct or just?
Why do Q and POTUS, if they are in control of our government, and the worlds best intelligence agencies, allow these things to continue then?
No I do not believe that everyone is sane or rational enough to be allowed to use or possess automobiles.
That is why I believe elderly individuals with impaired vision and people with a drunk driving record should not be allowed to drive an automobile period
Just because judges and politicians say something is morally acceptable, does it really make it morally acceptable and righteous?