Anonymous ID: 230c84 Aug. 4, 2019, 11:54 a.m. No.7340337   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0528

>>7340167

>Don't agree with some other anons in calling either of these ff's.

 

why would you believe these to be anything other than FF? consider the timing. remember, even if there were real dead bodies, it is still a FF if it is under the guise of a another "flag" (i.e., whitey flag, when in fact it was an DS operation).

Anonymous ID: 230c84 Aug. 4, 2019, 11:57 a.m. No.7340384   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0535

>>7340225

 

remember that even if there were dead bodies, it is still a FF if it was an operation under the guise of someone else's "flag". for example, if the DS activated sleeper/whackos to shoot up a city and claimed it was a white channer, then it is a FF.

 

this has all the earmarks of a deep state FF. timing, spin to fit their narrative, etc.

Anonymous ID: 230c84 Aug. 4, 2019, noon No.7340418   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0483 >>0641

>>7340298

 

to be fair, do you have any proof that anyone died? it is easier to prove a positive than a negative - the burden is on you to proof that anyone died.

 

remember, if the only proof you have is a (by now) discredited MSM, then your proof is lacking to many here…

 

you might be a shill or are still brainwashed, though

Anonymous ID: 230c84 Aug. 4, 2019, 12:05 p.m. No.7340485   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0559

>>7340397

 

no, just checking to make sure that you have evidence other than some reference to a (by now) discredited MSM article or source.

 

in fact, if the MSM is saying one thing, then the opposite is more likely than not true… meaning, your only proof is likely proof that it did not occur as portrayed.

Anonymous ID: 230c84 Aug. 4, 2019, 12:10 p.m. No.7340553   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7340483

 

with respect to anyone's family of any deceased (if any), I'm saying that whether someone died or not is not relevant to the question whether it was a FF

 

people conflate dead bodies with the event being "real" or "genuine" too often, without noting that it is undoubtedly a FF. the main point is that it was (((them))) and not a whacko gunman/whitey that needs to be emphasized.

 

see what I am saying? we lose the argument when we don't counter their bullshit in all the hysteria.

Anonymous ID: 230c84 Aug. 4, 2019, 12:15 p.m. No.7340629   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7340559

 

anon is possibly typing in all caps to emphasize that anon is frustrated with all the conflating of issues.

 

MSM is saying this is an act of a whitey/Trump supporter/gun nut, in order to enact a shutdown of 8chan/grab guns/and demonize Trump supporters. it is a FF.

 

anons like you need to clear about that, before you start down the road of supporting their narrative by blindly sympathizing with the (potential) victims and not calling them out

 

see? all caps anon is likely frustrated that it even semi-woke anons like yourself get lost in the fog of these events