>>737575

>>737518

We have another easily distinguishable bot format here…

I'm honestly surprised how quick they stopped the 'IMG_####.JPG' formatted picture naming system and moved on.

Too bad they still stick out like a sore thumb with the same formatting of posts.

>general no context image(attention grab)

>short arbitrary comment (always completely unrelated to qresearch but bordering on some potential link to something that might have/will be/en discussed)

>followed by link to a distraction/honeypot (Last time it was youtube links, now it's soundcloud links)

They don't even realise how robotic they make themselves out to be.

>>738334

I believe the term for use here is called

Jumping the shark.

Statistically 2 data points is not enough to form something statistically significant. Infact it's literally the first step of a coincidence.

We will see though haha, if pornfag comes back and Q posts again, then I'll start counting until it's statistically significant