>>7383620

>3Days3Nights

The guy has some interesting threads and is one of the accounts I followed (not twatter follow as I have no twat a/c as they insisted on a phone number) once infinity went dark. That being said, his threads are predominantly speculative with no sauce and some are quite outlandish, though potentially true. One thing highly suspicious is that his a/c was only created in June this year, his follower numbers skyrocketed. I am not the first to ask how he managed to amass so many so quickly.

I am making no claims, merely reiterating "Be careful who you follow"

>>7383843

>Is it possible they have been using taxpayer money all along to fund all their corrupt bullshit?

You are just asking now?

I think we have had the answer to that for quite a long time.

>>7384004

It would be better, imho, if that was reversed so the default was headers off!

>>7383930

>The sheer magnitude of the corruption.

Bigger than you can imagine.