>>7396783 pb
some will laugh.
I believe. "Hipsters" might very well laugh.
not at the evil, which they might expect.?
(Acclimated from the movies to so much horror).
But at the revealing of it
?
>>7396783 pb
some will laugh.
I believe. "Hipsters" might very well laugh.
not at the evil, which they might expect.?
(Acclimated from the movies to so much horror).
But at the revealing of it
?
Learn to read coms?.
First time in 43 years.
They skipped a year -2018.
She wore the Crown in 2017, since it's not, ya know 43 years ago.
She did wear it in 2017.
You're reading what is missing from the text.
i.e. your own imagination.
She dressed plain without a Crown in '74
>https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/queen-not-wearing-crown-queens-10659059
"And there was literally minimal fanfare for the Queen's arrival, with no heralds present as she makes her procession to the Chamber of the House of Lords to take the throne and deliver her speech."
"Prince Philip is missing what was likely to be his final appearance at the State Opening after being admitted to hospital with an infection last night. He was also set to be dressed down, wearing a morning coat rather than full naval uniform."
"The Queen and Prince Charles walked in behind the crown"
Hong Kong Pepe Chain
>>7397277 pb
Maybe next step it can be smashed into 1000 pieces.