RE: Not posting about ((them))

An Anon made some reasonable points about posting about the Jews for the next few days.

It's undeniable we will have lots of fresh eyes on us in the next 24 hours.

HOWEVER, not posting about the Jews would be going on the defensive, and we will no doubt have shills here trying to make us look bad (to discredit us).

WHAT IF, instead of going on the defensive, we go on the offensive. BUT WITH A CHANGE OF TACTICS. Post about the Jews BUT be specific. Don't say "the jews". Be specific.

Say "the fake jews", "the Ashkenazi Jews", or whoever the actual bad ones are.

The point being, take a few minutes to show you argument is fact motivated and not racial, or hate driven. USE IT AS A CHANCE TO RED PILL. Have every statement backed by a PROOF.

(I do think we should avoid the N-Word though, even for the shills. Just for the next 24-48 hours.)

This is our chance anons, to dispense red pills in mass to the people who need them most.

What are we going to do with it?

We can make this completely backfire on our enemy.

Do we owe that to Q/POTUS?

Is it worth "shaping up" for a day or 2?

What do you say Patriots?

WWG1WGA

>>740643

These are terrific!

Please post them tomorrow when the new eyes are on us.

Excellent work!

>>741013

That might work but may still sound ridiculous to normies.

What about "the cabal"?

I don't know the best approach.

I'm just saying, let's make sure we back up our claims with FACTS.

It's the difference between redpilling someone and having them immediately taking another blue pill and. going back to their false view of the world.

>>741093

Good point and exactly the type of tactic I'm trying to suggest.

Have everything we already know, backed up with the facts, when we state it.

We can reach some people if we do this correctly.