>>7406473 Q proof
HAHAHAHAHAHA are you a retarded boomer baker or something?
>gets no nomination
>gets shit on
>adds it anyway
Lurk more before baking.
>It's ok to put pure shit in notables, nothing to see here
>NOOOOOO YOU CAN'T CALL THINGS OUT, THAT'S DIVISIONFAGGING!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your blatant self promoting famefagging is fucking disgusting.
Did Q confirm the "Qclock" yet?
I think it's really sad the only prominent politician who has said ERIC CIARAMELLA is Rand Paul.
God bless him.
So as of now, the inbeechmintz is still in the house.
They haven't filed formal impeachment charges yet (they change what they could be every day ffs), nor have they voted on the charges of course.
IF they filed charges, and a majority of the house votes for the charges (which might not even happen, they might censure** which is a formal slap on the wrist), ONLY THEN would it go to the senate.
And yes, there would be a trial, which would allow republicans to call witnesses like Hunter Biden, Eric Ciaramella, Adam Schiff, Alexandra Chalupa, Fusion GPS members, and others. But there's no way they'd vote to remove and Trump will win reelection easily anyway.
**It's not even clear they have the votes. They had the votes for an INQUIRY, but that's much different than voting for impeachment. But in all likelihood they'll vote to impeach, the senate won't remove, and Trump wins by a bigger margin than if they hadn't done this.
But sheepish bakers continue to add them into notables out of utter newfaggotry.
>the baker that adds replies that have nothing to do with the post is baking again
oh ok that makes sense now
Go self promote somewhere else