Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 10:19 a.m. No.7412236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7412010

 

We don't need 320+ million people to have a country. We don't need immigrants or refugees to get us to or keep us at that number, either.

 

It's OK if our population goes down.

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 10:34 a.m. No.7412373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2390 >>2442

So I'm just a shittiot, can someone tell me how posting the minute before @POTUS does is a Q proof? Are there some numbers lining up that I didn't notice, or is it literally just because he posted right before POTUS?

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 10:34 a.m. No.7412390   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7412370

>>7412373

 

That's what I'm getting at. Why is posting right before @POTUS important, and how do we know 8kun's time isn't off ever so slightly to where he actually posted 1 second after POTUS?

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 10:44 a.m. No.7412486   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2499 >>2553

>>7412442

 

Yeah, I don't know anything about that. Q did post on his old trip (supposedly–I didn't see it because there was no clearnet address for the board at the time and it was post-migration to the new site) saying that he would use /projectDComms/, but that's all we've got so far (that I am aware of).

 

Other than that, all we are given is that Q appears to have posted in the 1-59 second period right before POTUS made a tweet with no connecting markers, and given that we don't know how accurately Twitter or 8kun are keeping time, it's actually possible that Q's post was made after POTUS's post.

 

Gonna need more to consider this a Q proof. I want to believe, but we are taught to be skeptical and think for ourselves.

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 10:50 a.m. No.7412560   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7412499

>At least keep up.

 

That is not a helpful post. If you are trying to be part of the great awakening, stop trolling people who are trying to understand and grasp what's going on. Post what you know or fuck off.

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 10:54 a.m. No.7412591   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2657

>>7412514

>What's next?

 

Maybe you can help me understand how a picture of a watch is a verification. I am not very good at this stuff and since you seem to understand it, can you explain it to me? The watch looks to be displaying 1:29:11 or so, this stuff confuses me

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 10:57 a.m. No.7412623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2669 >>2671

>>7412553

 

Oh, no. We're talking about gematria now. So basically, anything can mean anything you want it to, since there's no logic or structure being applied. You just play with numbers however you want until they look like or imply what you want them to. Or maybe you can explain the logic behind this? I am but a simple EOD tech, I don't think too good and I may have been a little too close to a few too many explosions.

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 11:02 a.m. No.7412650   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2691

>>7412626

>If you persist in screeching about the watch pictures at this point, then you can't even use stupidity as an excuse, you are an obvious shill

 

I don't understand what the watch picture is supposed to mean. Stop calling people shills for not having the same understanding as you. If you understand it, you should be able to clearly explain what it means. If you can't, you are making a leap of faith; be honest about that, some of us don't want to do that. I myself prefer to understand what I'm placing faith in.

 

Your manner is not constructive or helpful to anyone. Remember, if you are rude to truth seekers you will be left behind; Q said so himself. Calling everyone shills makes it easier for shills to blend in. So cut it out. Don't be a fuck.

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 11:03 a.m. No.7412665   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7412657

 

Okay, so the time on the watch isn't important, that was what had me confused. Instead it's the make\model of the watch? I don't recognize it or know where I can look up what watch that is but at least now I can quit worrying about the time shown on the watch.

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 11:06 a.m. No.7412678   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2686 >>2700

>>7412653

>The authentication of Q's new tripcode has been performed in a manner that people with crypto background find satisfactory.

 

>That is sufficient.

 

Thanks for your assertion, ANON, you are no one, ANON, you don't get to decide what's sufficient for other people, ANON. You are committing a classic fallacy, argument from authority.

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 11:08 a.m. No.7412692   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7412671

 

Gematria and numerology are often abused around here to imply everything based on nothing, it's garbage unless they can show WHY they perform the operations they do on the numbers they use. Some of the Q proofs in the past have had tangible numerical connections, such as the clock time of the post matching up with a date of a POTUS tweet and having a keyword in common between them, but this doesn't have that, so I am still looking. People in the comments above shouting "shill" left and right at the unconvinced, this place really has not improved at all

Anonymous ID: 081f0b Dec. 2, 2019, 11:10 a.m. No.7412709   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7412700

 

It probably is the real Q, but I don't want people shouting authoritative bullshit at me when I try to work out for myself why the connection is important. Be better.