Anonymous ID: 43d892 Dec. 2, 2019, 3:21 p.m. No.7414444   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4447 >>4471 >>4521 >>4646 >>4902 >>5023

>>7414341

>>7414375

 

Meh. Unknown what the outcome of the Judge's ruling will be. 3 of the 16 that were arrested have had their charges dismissed. The issue is how the Marines were arrested in front of the Battalion (1/5). Battalion Commander should fire his lawyer.

 

— Fox Article from 16NOV2019 —

A military judge has ruled the arrests of 16 U.S. Marines accused of human smuggling during a Camp Pendleton Battalion formation were unlawful and a violation of their rights, according to reports. Video of the July mass arrest surfaced last week. The Marines were hauled out of the formation and accused of participating in a scheme to smuggle illegal immigrants into the U.S. from Mexico, according to reports. “It sends a signal to the government, I’m not going to tolerate, and we should not tolerate, a command basically imposing the verdict before the court is ever held,” Bethany Payton-O’Brien, an attorney for one of the accused Marines told CBS 8 San Diego. Several Marines arrested in connection to human smuggling investigationVideo

It’s unclear, however, what impact the judge’s ruling will have on the charges against the Marines, the station reported. Charges against three of the 16 Marines were eventually dismissed by prosecutors. The arrests were witnessed by 800 members of the 1st Battalion, 5th Marines, according to reports. Payton-O’Brien said the arrests were an attempt by commanders to exert unlawful command influence over the case, CBS 8 reported. “The public humiliation of my client and others in the case was wrong. It was illegal and the Marine Corps' attempt to try to influence the outcome of this case and poison the jury pool,” she said. The San Diego Union-Tribune quoted the judge who issued the ruling, Col. Stephen Keane, as rejecting a prosecution argument that the arrests were done during the battalion formation to ensure safety because some of the Marines were suspected of weapons offenses.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/marines-camp-pendleton-human-smuggling-arrests-unlawful

Anonymous ID: 43d892 Dec. 2, 2019, 3:45 p.m. No.7414596   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4616 >>4703 >>4811

>>7414487

>>7414500

 

The [D5] state funeral probability notable? Absolutely, Q was talking about it how long ago?

 

As far as anon calling out the 95, meh. Not so sure. In this context I read this as the statistical rule which is the percentage of values that lie within a band around the mean of a standard distribution (bell curve). The numbers 68-95-99.7 are widths of 1, 2, and 3 standard deviations. The punchline is, I believe, what are the odds that a state funeral falls on [D5]. We are well into the tails of the standard distribution 99.7+ meaning highly un-fucking-likely.

 

Yimmy Carter being 95 is a coincidence IMO as Q specifically calls out the rule, not Yimmy's age.

 

Sauce: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2%80%9395%E2%80%9399.7_rule

Anonymous ID: 43d892 Dec. 2, 2019, 3:53 p.m. No.7414718   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4876

>>7414677

 

Nominating Notable

 

Given the boss's latest post I'm nominating this as a notable "Past Dig RE: LP in Lon" or something better so newer fags see past anon work. Disregard if this idea is shit – graphic really helped me.

Anonymous ID: 43d892 Dec. 2, 2019, 3:56 p.m. No.7414772   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5024

>>7414703

 

Agreed. My main point probably didn't come across well - was just focusing on Carter's age being 95 not being part of the rule quoted. The likelihood that Q could predict a state funeral that far in advance without there being DS narrative fuckery involved is near nil. Too many variables involved.

 

Spoopy how accurate these past posts are. Exciting times for sure anon!

Anonymous ID: 43d892 Dec. 2, 2019, 4:20 p.m. No.7415031   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5053

Anons: please rock out along with me. Year of the boomerang muff huckas!

 

It pleases me that a Bloomberg ad for President plays before muh Youtube video plays.