>>7414299

Meh go away namefag.

Perhaps they mention McDonalds because McDonalds is implicated, perhaps they mention the "Jews" because they're implicated, point is you'll never know if you censor and filter.

Examine every data point as a data point. Utilize your God given intelligence to determine truth from fallacy.

Removing uncomfortable data points removes pieces of the puzzle from view.

Your post as a data point shows you have an agenda. Your agenda is censorship.

Literally can't deny that the DS hides behind the label of "jew" it's pretty well known and irrefutable. So why even bother? They hide behind many other labels as well.

>>7414339

Definitely not a Tantrum, you can take it as you will.

You're advocating that people self censor because others want to censor them. That doesn't really make much sense mate.

We can't have people scared or unwilling to post whatever information comes up. If it implicates Jews, Catholics, Christians, Chinese, Americans, it doesn't matter. It's a data point to be added to the collective consciousness. You're advocating for the removal of one specific set of data points - You have an agenda.

I don't agree with that so I made my point clear. Adding my data point in reference to your data point. It's simple.

>>7414425

Deep sweetie…

So I advocate for the complete removal of censorship - Outside of gore, porn, ect. allowing all viewpoints to be allowed and judged by their merits and that makes me a deep stater.

I honestly thought you'd have a better objection then that.

You're advocating for protecting "Jews" whether they're deepstate or not. I'm advocating for exposing all bad actors, regardless of religion or nationality.

You can try to push back against me but at least try to have some substance.

Give me one good reason why indiscretions by Jews and the Israeli government shouldn't be exposed along with indiscretions by Americans, Chinese, Russians, ect?

If you have a good reason, you may change my mind. But I haven't seen a good reason beyond blind loyalty to both the Jewish religion and the current state of Israel.

My loyalty is to America and the future we can unlock for our children and the species as a whole. It's why I joined the Marines, and why I'm here on this board.

Your loyalty is to Jews, Israel, yourself, and probably a few others.

Unlike you I don't care who the Truth implicates.

>>7414527

We believe in free speech not just because of the Constitution but because it's in our moral and ethical code to give everyone a voice and to allow that voice to be determined by merit.

Denying the voice because they don't fall under the US constitutional protections violates our moral and ethical code.

Terrible argument mate - Do better. Be better.

>>7414488

Incorrect.

I'm not aiming at your mind. I'm aiming at offering a counter point to those who would see your post and not follow logical thought processes to see where your path leads.

You have an agenda and it's unlikely I would swing you from your agenda. What I can do, however, is offer a counter push and add another data point beside yours and allow others reading to decide for themselves.

It's not personal for me. My morals and ethics simply require that I respond with my point of view to prevent your voice from operating solo without a counter point.

Simple and easy mate. Not hard to understand. I don't need to change your mind.

In fact I gain more from you remaining stubbornly in place refusing to even refute any of my points because it strengthens my case.

>>7414599

Semper Fi Q.

Sad that I'll be out of contact for the drop on the 9th. I'll be looking forward to returning for the fallout though.

Fight on!

>>7414768

Lovely bait. Which means the real killing blow will probably come after. This will be another blow to soften their defenses and pull more public across.