READING THE MAP
The spider web map concept is a good example of what's been concerning me, primarily because there are two basic types of Q postings: one type is "management," while the other is "serious traffic." I put a lot of time into the graphical Q map, but I don't think the final answer is going to involve listing every single message. It's far more likely going to involve selecting the ones that are "real traffic," i.e. stringers and stuff that would be broadcast if things worked that way. MOSTLY (but not always) messages that don't reference any other anon postings. This is why I was worried about placement of the messages; namely where should the columns break? So we have issues of inclusion and placement dictating the final map solution.
The "serious traffic" group can be further subdivided into postings that relate specifically to Trump's tweets, and ones that are direct info about the structure and operation of the cabal. I personally think that ultimately the map solution will involve only Q messages that don't refer to Trump's tweets and ones that don't reference other Anon messages.
Until that map is truly figured out, we're missing out on a wealth of info and we're missing the primary stuff that Q is trying to convey. The reason it isn't just "dumps" is so that we dig and we think and we acclimate ourselves mentally to what is really going on. It's a learning curve, to be sure. One does not simply jump in and change one's world paradigm on a dime. It's a process, not an event.
So that's the gist of it: categorizing Q's messages into "Trump tweet related," "chit-chat," and "heavy info" seems to be a good first step. I'll try that and see where it leads.
Another version of this graphical map is coming; one that integrates Trump's tweets right into the flow as if they were Q messages. But they'll be white backgrounds and different color frames so they really stand out as Trump tweets. This will make that godawful map even bigger, but that's the way it goes.