>>7429143

It is very common for members of the media to be here and attept to find leads or, most commonly, discover data so they can begin to conjure a counter story. They are very easy to spot and extremely enjoyable to fuck with once spotted. Frankly I would have a hell of a lot of respect for a journalist, of any political aisle, if they just came on here, stated who they were, asked the pertinent questions needed for a story, and then did what they felt they needed to do. However, at this point all they are is an extension of the DNC and every single thing they state is either an attempt to get ahead of an issue or an attempt to pin the exact thing their overlords are doing on the opposite side of the aisle.

It's all so easy to notice at this point and even bothering with the MSM for even a single iota of data is useless as there is (quite literally) nothing they produce that I didn't know about long beforehand. They get their breaking data from those such as us, nearly all their research is done by those like us, and they are absolutely here, even right now, looking for one of those two things. People like Wilson mean absolutely nothing to the scheme of the world, literally nothing, as I stated years ago when we (privchan, different channel) were considering looking into a specific issue: "Look at his background and experience. He is nothing, he has done nothing, he means nothing. There is not one single achievement or connection is the mans life that shows anything that makes him an expert (at anything), anything that makes him quotable, anything that makes him anything other than a completely useless tool that is an embarrassment in every plausible way."

He is nothing, his entire history is full of nothing, his entire methods are nothing, his entire life has amounted to nothing. He is the absolute and most prime example of what it is to be a TRUE born loser in every possible way. The only thing about Wilson that I wish could occur is him having the testicular fortitude to actually dare show up, announce himself, and stand by his issues/debate them. He tries to pass himself off as some important and tough dude but he is nothing more than, as stated, a literal nothing and is even too cowardly to personally take on the exact group of people he writes about. There are very few who are beneath him on the "embarrassment to mankind" ladder.

>>7429257

I have been writing a lot of text if all my comments here since this whole thing began as I loath half ass'd answers. Especially in cases such as the need for emphasing an explanation. There is no doubt he is controlled but even still, the man has no teeth in anything he does and all he does is act like some high school Chad in a way to try to make himself seem important while dividing the Republican party. If he had even the slightest, even the lowest level of integrity he would either face his issues directly or he would step forward and out those who may/may not be holding him.

But no, all he does is sit in line like a good tool to be used to harm the society. He is despicable.

>>7429277

What a surprise, we begin to look into and discover the connections of Karlan/Canales and they begin to spread on social media and then…. as usual…. "active shooter" situation randomly happens.

>>7429303

I do not need your authorization nor description of what this board is and is used for. If you do not like my response then scroll past it. I have uncovered and exposed enough data through the period to take a break now and again and blast a moron if I feel the desire, which I did, since I personally dislike traitors and especially those within the media.

>>7429321

Fair enough. Either way, it makes no difference to me.

Oh I absolutely love it when they throw people out to dig into as they always make it so easy and think they know our research methods/think they can block those of us who truly know how to properly do it.

It appears that Madame Karlan is a racist and her comment about Barron Trump today was not the first time she has attacked "straight white children of powerful men". 10:01 onward.

BAKER

>>7429667

Mind you this was way back in 2006 and this was a rally for her to begin to introduce Clinton's first Presidential campaign which she eventually lost to Obama a year later. But this was their rhetoric even back then and we all know it went back much further than that. This "hate white" was being setup in the mid 90s in my memory, with an emphasis on 1993 as a big year for it to begin.

Either way though, she has a proven track record of attacking "straight, white" children and this right here, along with todays antics proves it. She is a racist, she is anti white, and there is literally nothing that can counter that, the record is clear.

>>7429721

No she is referring to HRC as this was from 2006.