dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anons, I think this should be noted.

It's good to learn shill tactics

This is a thread on cuckchan right now (pic related):

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/235202924

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/235202924

Some shill is trying to claim there was a post that the shooter in Hawaii posted there before the shooting.

BUT

IT'S

FAKE

Here's the real post:

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/235183655/#235202041

They shopped that screenshot and are trying to pass it off as real. A legitimate false flag by shills on cuckchan (pic related).

Just noting this, because they could try it here too.

SLOPPY JOB SHILLS

Anonymous ID: 92a56c Dec. 4, 2019, 6:36 p.m. No.7429851 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>0446

>>7429837

Sorry, bigger pic

>>7429853

Neither would I.

But I wanted to note that due to the way 8chan got shut down.

Anonymous ID: 92a56c Dec. 4, 2019, 6:41 p.m. No.7429886 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>9915

This is becoming an every bread thing.

Nice.

>>7429920

>[Cloudflare]

Is ebot hotwheels?

THE IMPEACHMENT VOTE IS NOT GUARANTEED

Here's why.

The democrats need 218 votes for impeachment, and they have 233 democrats in congress with 1 independent who would likely vote for impeachment (234 essentially). The republicans have 197.

31 of those democrats are in a district that Trump won. Assuming every republican votes against impeachment, the democrats will FAIL to impeach Trump if at least 17 of these democrats vote against impeachment.

TWO democrats even voted against the inquiry. The vote for the inquiry and a vote to impeach are NOT the same thing politically, and it's plausible some or many of these vulnerable democrats could vote against impeachment.

These are democrats in districts Trump won:

>Rep. Tom O’Halleran (AZ-01)

>Rep. Lucy McBath (GA-06)

>Rep. Lauren Underwood (IL-14)

>Rep. Cheri Bustos (IL-17)

>Rep. Abby Finkenauer (IA-07)

>Rep. Dave Loebsack (IA-02)

>Rep. Cindy Axne (IA-03)

>Rep. Jared Golden (ME-02)

>Rep. Elissa Slotkin (MI-08)

>Rep. Haley Stevens (MI-11)

>Rep. Angie Craig (MN-02)

>Rep. Collin Peterson (MN-07)*

>Rep. Susie Lee (NV-03)

>Rep. Chris Pappas (NH-01)

>Rep. Jefferson Van Drew (NJ-02)*

>Rep. Andy Kim (NJ-03)

>Rep. Josh Gottheimer (NJ-05)

>Rep. Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11)

>Rep. Xochitl Torres Small (NM-02)

>Rep. Max Rose (NY-11)

>Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (NY-18)

>Rep. Antonio Delgado (NY-19)

>Rep. Anthony Brindisi (NY-22)

>Rep. Kendra Horn (OK-05)

>Rep. Matt Cartwright (PA-08)

>Rep. Conor Lamb (PA-17)

>Rep. Joe Cunningham (SC-01)

>Rep. Ben McAdams (UT-04)

>Rep. Elaine Luria (VA-02)

>Rep. Abigail Spanberger (VA-07)

>Rep. Ron Kind (WI-03)

*Voted AGAINST the inquiry

Sauce for 31 democrats:

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/434113-the-31-trump-districts-that-will-determine-the-next-house-majority

Sauce for two who voted against the inquiry:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/who-broke-ranks-on-impeachment-resolution-vote

CALLING ALL MEMEFAGS, THIS IS PART OF THE 2020 MEME WAR.

LET US MEME THIS INTO REALITY.

pasta, trying to get this spread and seen by anons, especially memefags and twitterfags.

Anonymous ID: 92a56c Dec. 4, 2019, 7:30 p.m. No.7430248 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>0290

>>7430218

An anon earlier said it'd be good for it to go to the senate so evidence can be introduced.

But just imagine the bitching and whining liberals would do if they failed to impeach.

It'd be fucking epic.

>>7430249

I can't imagine Trump being impeached is part of The Plan.

The reaction to the deep state's move is to expose them in the senate IF impeachment goes on.

Graham can call those people without an impeachment trial tbh.

Anonymous ID: 92a56c Dec. 4, 2019, 7:35 p.m. No.7430279 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>0289

>>7430267

You mean the search engine for /qresearch/?

Same as it was on 8ch: qresear.ch

Not sure what you mean though.

>>7430280

Consider: >>7429837

If you would want to add it, let me repost the graphic with the text (the original is too small).

If not, all good baker thanks!

Anonymous ID: 92a56c Dec. 4, 2019, 7:37 p.m. No.7430302 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>0339

>>7430289

Then up, it's qresear.ch

>>7430290

But the dems can then say they legitimately impeached him. No one thinks he'll be removed anyway.

IF it's prevented, Graham can still call everyone and expose them after Trump beat the coup. It'd be a triumphant trial instead of a defensive one.

>>7430339

>>7430352

Oh either way now it will be a landslide for Trump.

My point is if impeachment could be avoided, it'd be a historic, and honestly righteous, win for Trump. And the evidence can still be introduced nonetheless by Graham and the senate as an oversight role.