https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1202573673049272320
Was this just announced, or did we know about it previously?
Ooops didn't look at the date.
17 posts, mostly shitty memes. Hmmm…..
My guess is this is why…all the Dems running are trying to protect themselves…they've ALL done something. There's no earthly reason why a faggot mayor from SB would think he has a shot in the Democratic Primary when the entire party knows by now the fix is always in for the favored candidate. I think it's why the race is playing out like a circus of the absurd…Biden, Beto, Yang…even THEY are not taking it seriously.
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1202328148047749120
Of course, AT&T owns CNN, so it'll be interesting how they respond if Graham does this.
Now this fucker can't even get his shitty memes to display the right side up.
Apparently Guliani was using them, because the subpoena was for his records.
Head scratcher? Or perhaps a trap set for AT&T…
Don't forget Cruz…and possibly others. I think this will be the shot heard round the world, when it's disclosed through Bull Durham's work that they were conducting surveillance on other Republicans.
Q drops on AT&T
Also, their CEO stepped down in December of 2017 and was mentioned in a Q post.
CEO was slated to step down in a Q post (Dec. 2017), and yet he remains to this day. So did POTUS strike a deal with him at that meeting allowing him to stay? Curious…
I'll be slightly disappointed if we don't get a Senate trial.
Shit, judge Nap is on. Grab the puke bucket.
Not a lawfag, but "implications" would not be enough to stop a proceeding. There would have to be a full fledged indictment before the question would even be considered, I think. But there wouldn't be enough time for that to happen.
A Senate trial is the BEST venue to reveal ALL of their criminal activities, so we wouldn't want to stop that, anyway. Everything they've done is evidence because it's the REASON they wanted to stop POTUS to begin with.
Trump Case:
1) They illegally spied on political enemies.
2) They did so to overturn the election (treason).
3) They committed treason to stop the disclosure of their crimes (selling state secrets, racqueteering, murder, child trafficking, etc…)
Number 3 goes to motive. Everything is fair game. Aside from that, there are no limits to the Trump defense. If he wants to argue he's innocent because HRC is an ugly bitch, then he's allowed to mount that defense.