Gotta agree with megafag on this one.
I don't think it's a verification of Q.
Q verified themselves by doing the deltas and posting the picture.
To each their own though.
It's especially flimsy because there's a "j" in every tweet.
That graphic making me think less of it and it more as a stretch.
An unnecessary stretch I should add.
I don't make random shit up to fit something I want to be true, making anons and Q look ridiculous.
Like that retarded graphic you posted does by mixing the real verification with fanfiction.
>doesn't like what someone says
>MUST BE AFLB
No, I'm not a tranny with a disgustingly gaping front hole.
That shit is Qclock-Gematria tier bullshit.
Go back to reddit boomer.
Gimme a sec. Will try.
And I'm referring to that 2nd part of the graphic in this bread as being retarded.
The other one is cool but unnecessary like I said. They use the J that's in every tweet as one of them, just seems like a stretch.
The other one is hilarious.
The best way to prove something is NOT a one time occurrence is to find another example, I could not find one, and to give the odds of it happening to show its rarity, which you did.
The best way to persuade someone that that one time occurrence has meaning is to provide that meaning in the context of how rare it is, which is done with the delta between Q and Trump.
I already think it's legit, I wanted to see how anons would react to skepticism. I'm over at cuckchan a lot and I have to explain shit out explicitly for an anon to understand something about Q which most of the time is ignored but some anons really start understanding Q's comms and the value of Q when I pivot to the redpilling and information warfare part of it. I knew I'd get heat and be called a shill LMFAO, but wanted to see how well anons could defend the graphic. You did the best job (except for calling me AFLB which I took as an insult, heh) and the other anon who challenged me to find another example which I couldn't.
It's not a new graphic though, I guess many anons are seeing it for the first time.
tldr, I was pretending to be retarded
Skepticism is healthy though, every proof should be able to be defended and an argument about it won.
>Whats up with the QRB
Basically ded, /qresearch/ is HQ and the weaponized autistic hivemind should be here.
>why is it even still around?
Idk, it got migrated I guess.
>Has Q posted there?
No.
>haha lol board drama
/qresearch/ is comfy, board is running well, and I'm comfy. We got shit to do.
And no not a BV.
>1.6734324e+21
Impressive. That's similar to the odds anons were calculating for the [0] deltas between Trump and Q.
see: >>7437033
>Trump tweet within one minute of the Q post that also contains them
And exactly, I wasn't even looking for a delta'd tweet, I was just looking for a pure tweet with the combination, and couldn't going back a few months.
I'm not denying or refuting anything that happened.
At this point, I honestly don't care because /qresearch/ has always been more important and that 3 months of it being shutdown was fucked up.
We have so much shit to do and get caught up on.
I personally think you can tell which one of Q team is posting based on the "voice" like you're saying.
There's a few distinct styles. I have my theories on who they are, but of course we don't dox Q.
Trump is STILL continually confirming Q with retweets, tweets, and statements, and Q continually shows they have insider information all the time.
Which brings me back to my original point of trying to get anons to do some bantz with me as if I'm a skeptical anon. There are still a lot of autists who just don't know about Q but could be assets and by knowing how to explain Q to them you could help them understand Q.
>15 minute ban on cuckchan
fucking hilarious
Especially you.
Yea that went well.