Why is the throuplist calling

Inebriated Nancy the "Boss"?

https://twitter.com/KatieHill4CA/status/1202622667377070080?s=19

These statements do not jive….

"Earlier this week we found that Rep. Adam Schiff collected the phone call records of reporters, the president’s attorney and his colleague Devin Nunes."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/do-nothing-lindsey-graham-shoots-down-gop-lawmakers-says-he-will-not-subpoena-adam-schiffs-phone-records-video/

"House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff spied on the top Republican on his panel by obtaining his phone records and publishing them in an impeachment report, Minority Whip Steve Scalise said Wednesday"

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/scalise-schiff-spying-on-nunes-with-call-records?_amp=true

"Patrick Boland, the top spokesman for Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, told The Daily Beast on Thursday that investigators “did not subpoena call records for any member of Congress or their staff… or for any journalist,” including—Boland added—the committee’s ranking member, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) or John Solomon, a columnist formerly of The Hill whose reporting formed much of the public case for Rudy Giuliani and others to do their muckraking in Ukraine. "

https://www.thedailybeast.com/adam-schiff-no-we-didnt-subpoena-john-solomons-phone-records?source=articles&via=rss

What's the angle here?

To force Schiff into a defense that will counter future claims by fake news and democrats that get caught up in data collection of targets?