Can an Anon explain how Schiff was able to get Guiliani's phone records.
Parnes had been indicted. But Guiliani has not. So what is the basis he is using to justify this?
"The report indicates that all of the call records obtained by the committee belonged to Parnas or Giulini. "
From DailyBeast
https://www.thedailybeast.com/adam-schiff-no-we-didnt-subpoena-john-solomons-phone-records?source=articles&via=rss
Nunes and Solomon records involved are reported to be only be when spoken to Parnas or Guiliani. So how are they justifying Guiliani?