>>7439698 (PB)
That was a diversion. She was expressing a desire to rally. He changed the topic to the professionally organized and astroturfed Antifa and BLM rallies.
There is no reason why we could not also organize a rally.
His approach was defeatist.
WHY aren't we able to organize?
Nobody has said that a 3-4 minute call on Rush is the place to organize a rally. Not me. Not the caller.
She raised the question of "Why don't we organize one?" That's all.
But it WAS long enough for Rush to rain on the idea.
Rush has gone from making money to protecting it. He's invested in his country club life. Hannity, too. Both have gotten their membership cards to the Cool Kids Club punched and are next to useless in actual analysis and presentation.
The moment they stop being controlled opposition, the gravy train comes to a halt. There isn't a single conservative radio or tv show in a major market anywhere in the US that isn't bracketed by liberal product and hosted by a liberal media org. using the straight news to shape perspective.
The conservative content is bait to get us conditioned to the liberal stuff it is smothered in.
We heard the same broadcast, but I think that I am a bit more cynical than you.
I get Beck, Rush and Hannity in that order. Of the 3, Beck – whom I formerly could not stomach – is currently the most useful.
Rush believes his own "half my brain" PR.
Hannity just wants to talk until the red light on the camera goes off.
Beck at least attempts to present information and fact-based analysis.
My girl. Does a couple great Christmas sets, too!
"spellcheck" should have an "s" ==>"spellchecks"
You're new here, aren't you?
With the law, HOW you obtain information is even more important than the information itself. Because if you can't show that you obtained it properly, you can't use it. While you can shotgun a subpoena, you typically know exactly what information you expect to obtain. If it's obtained by subpoena, you can probably use it. If you got it in a back alley deal for a bag of crack … probably not.