Something I am confused on as my own experience along with recent research just doesn't make much sense about a recent happening from the SCOTUS. How to explain this…

Okay, so to my understanding, and granted I could be wrong here but I do not believe I am. But anyhow, to my understanding, the oversight of lower courts and to put a hold on their decisions or give them an extension to provide materials (to the lower court) is handled by the most junior of Justices. As it stands right now the most junior would be Kavanaugh. This came up several years back when I noticed Kagan was putting holds on/extending lower court decisions while the SCOTUS determines the viability of a case OR to give time to the lower court to deal with new data. Kagan took care of numerous such issues back then. I thought nothing of it at the time and figured it was merely procedure. More recently I noticed Gorsuch was handling such things and there are many articles to point to this being the case when he first came in as a junior Justice.

Fast forward to recently and we see that Ginsburg made the decision to halt the lower court until December 13th on the POTUS financial records. This struck me as odd because it broke from the very consistent norm of the junior justices handling such writs in terms of extending or halting.

My question: Am I incorrect here as, in the past, it appears that the writ literally went through the most junior Justices law clerks and only ever touched the desk of the higher Justices if there was a needed vote for stay, extension or SCOTUS accepting of the issue. I just do not see why Ginsburg would ever be involved in this seeing as she is second longest standing Justice on the SCOTUS and Kavanaugh would be responsible for such things at this point in time.

>>7446787

One of the most serene places I have ever been and I have been there many times. A beautiful memorial that, in recent years, has really fallen into poor order needing to be cleaned up.

>>7446829

Looks like Feinstein to me.

>>7446847

Highest probability - Mossad

Other potential given the circumstances - MOS = Military code for job (called AFSC in Air Force).

>>7446856

>>7446954

>Why was there a coordinated effort to ban/remove 8ch?

It was always about the QAnon discussion. They had no control over it, it was spiraling out of control in terms of their ability to control the narrative, they had to do something and thus they created the means to do so through a serious event which, later, was used as a means to remove 8chan under the narrative of it being a place to network for such attacks.

The main target was and always was the QAnon movement to silence it, attempt to control it, and so on. When the servers migrated directly to the DOD they realized two things:

1) QAnon is a real situation and connected to the DOD directly. At this point all articles/narratives about the movement ceased completely.

2) A means for them to legally request and gain data on who is posting (other than QAnon) through a Five Eyes country request (New Zealand) which, under agreement, was to be sent to said Five Eyes country. I have no idea if they succeeded in doing this and were able to ascertain who is posting, etc.

From here QAnon team had to fully migrate the discussion to a place where they and only they controlled everything coming in and out which was a DoD server which the clowns could not touch. If I am right about this that also says to me that QAnon team understands their timeline and how much time they have to handle all these issues less they lose the control of the server when/if a clown cheats their way into office.

>>7447089

Given the context it clearly is referring to Mossad. That is the most logical conclusion based on what it is being asked along with. Though I presented MOS (military job code) as the only other potential in my mind I have little doubt it means Mossad and the shilling associated with trying to diminish that probability speaks volumes.

>>7447104

To some anon, a very small handful and, frankly, it is obvious to see they are a controlled op to push that agenda which, later, can be used as a means to control the narrative and claim anti semitism.

However, for those who actually look into these issues and do not care about racial, religious, and all such things it is obvious there are absolutely bad players on that side of the Israeli street. At this point in time I have come to believe there are two major groups withing Israel itself both vying for power. One sits on a very dangerous global scale and is extremely prevelant in all global affairs. The other is more ancient and sits more in line with our beliefs of freedom and coming together to rid the world of those players.

>>7447139

This also falls in line with Jack leaving the country for Africa on the 9th of December. He claims that will be his new home. So for Drudge to say "was" falls in line with what Jack appears to be about to do. They are fleeing and fleeing to the new wild west - Africa.

>>7447177

Well of course.

>>7447218

I can tell you that OSI absolutely used to vet the foreign training pilots massively but around 1997 this system was heavily attacked by the then Clinton administration. It used to be that foreign pilot training at Maxwell required serious vetting to each and every single foreign pilot coming into country. The Clinton admin changed that. What it is now, I do not know for certain but from those I know who still serve it was changed significantly again (even worse) in 2013 but was again changed back to (close) to what it was in the early 90s during the Trump admin.

The Clinton and Obama admins greatly weakened the vetting process for foreign pilots/troops to our bases but since then the Trump admin has raised them again. OSI should have been all over that issue.

>>7447328

It has to. I mean that literally, it has to if President Trump is going to be able to fix the issues. It all will have to come out. If we look at this merely from a POTUS perspective you also have to take into consideration the threats against his family. So in his mind (no particular order)

a) Fix America, get the poison out and set the country up to move forward in the right direction.

b) Assure the safety of his family given what he is up against and how they will threaten or harm anyone/everyone associated with him. Especially at this part of the game as he has crossed their red line and is actively seeking to destroy them/all they built up which puts him and his family directly in their sights as the most dangerous entity on earth to them. They will stop at nothing, do anything, and sacrifice anyone/everyone to stop it.

So for him to fully "win" he has to expose them in full. No half measures, never a half measure, it must be a full measure or the potential for retaliation against the US and his family will remain. Donald Trump would never (ever) take such a risk. This is a man who has taken on the most powerful mob families in the world, endured the most ridiculous media attacks in the history of the species, and has had numerous "trusted" people turn out to be snakes. He knows the game, has long played the game, long prepared for this, and he knows that to truly "win" he has to clear the board.

I wish I could work for the man as he truly epitomizes what I consider a high level of loyalty and integrity. Two things woefully lacking in modern society. Reminds me so much of my own Father.

>>7447424

While I fully agree with this it must be said that until the indoctrination centers (ie: schools) are rid of the prime movers in assuring indoctrination occurs, it will be a losing battle to obtain critical thought by the upcoming generations. Education needs serious help.

>>7447448

The moment David Hogg was accepted to Harvard people should have recognized what Harvard truly is. Many have known for a long time now but the younger generations should have seen that for what it was and how the pieces all fit.