>>7448814 Assuredly.
<>We should get more drops in regards to Hugh Hefner's Honey pot operation.
>"WE"? How about you.
>The hard work's already been done. Check archives. Moar than anyone ever wanted to know about Heffner.
From this
https://twitter.com/WattersWorld/status/1203403806110699521
While a biased POV shelters/protects the host, the overall discussion [eyes on] generates awareness.
Q
I surmise that the Watters program has already been taped/produced, and that Q is aware of the precise content.
Yep. Feels good man!
Nothing to add. Why would Q promote the show unless he knew what result it would bring?