Awful coordination by bakers this afternoon. Step it up less we deal with their oldest bullshit trick again and again.
I know what they are trying to do as they have been trying to do it for years now. The way we have always gotten in front of it is by Baker coordination to assure they cannot do it and to assure legitimate researchers migrate to the proper bread.
The shills have a clear narrative mandate this morning/afternoon which is obvious since Q called out the Mossad connection. No idea why the Baker is allowing into notables a completely different theory which limits the obvious Mossad connection and also not immediately planning the next bread (in the previous bread). It is sloppy and needs remedy (which is simple).
QAnon, I would like to recommend to the President and your unit (if you are indeed what I believe you to be) to put Josh Kaleb Watson in for a posthumous awarding of the Medal of Honor and Navy Cross. His actions meet the standard as he:
a) Watson stood against an enemy of the United States during the War on Terror thus meeting the standard of combat action against while engaged against an enemy of the United States.
b) His actions came at the cost of his own life while bravely saving the lives of many others on the base. This gallantry cannot be overstated.
c) Combat Heroism is typically associated with acts within combat zones. However, given that the shooter brought the combat zone to the United States and onto a military installation it can be said that this would qualify as said combat zone given the nature of the War on Terror.
d) Watson epitomized the honor and integrity of the armed forces of the United States by his actions both before the event and through his actions during the event.
For these reasons, and others which OSI/Navy Intel will likely discover, I believe Watson should immediately be considered for the highest level of commendation by the President.
I must admit that I am a bit disgusted by not only the usual suspects within the MSM (which all would know why/agree with of course) but also that of Fox News in that they have never once came onto these breads, announced who they were/represented, validated their identity, and then proceeded to ask questions directly about the why, the what and so on, in relation to the research. There has been absolutely no journalism into the issue save the fraud so called "experts", manufactured narratives, and of course the shilling/controlled assets claiming the movement is this or that.
If I were a journalist the first and most important thing I would look into is a direct conversation with those involved in something before reporting on it. Yet not a single one of them have ever had the integrity to do so. They bring in those with no connection to the real research, the quote/create ridiculous narratives associated with the research, and they have, as stated, never taken the time to simply have a conversation with the actual people doing it when all they need to do is click on a website, announce themselves, validate themselves, and proceed to ask about what they feel needs to be discussed. Instead it's all about so called "experts" and their ridiculous assumptions which rarely come close to accuracy.