Anonymous ID: 9c4725 Dec. 7, 2019, 5:50 p.m. No.7451193   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1231 >>1233

When the shills and black hats try to divide you along racial lines always remember, there is only ONE race, HUMAN.

 

We may look a little different, have some different cultural backgrounds, but we are ALL still only humans.

 

There is no other race of people.

Anonymous ID: 9c4725 Dec. 7, 2019, 5:59 p.m. No.7451324   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1357

>>7451233

Really? Why don't you go look up what the definition of, "species," actually is. The truth is, there isn't one that every discipline agrees on.

 

It is nothing more than an arbitrary classification system created by man.

 

While the definitions given above may seem adequate, when looked at more closely they represent problematic species concepts. For example, the boundaries between closely related species become unclear with hybridisation, in a species complex of hundreds of similar microspecies, and in a ring species. Also, among organisms that reproduce only asexually, the concept of a reproductive species breaks down, and each clone is potentially a microspecies. Though none of these are entirely satisfactory definitions, scientists and conservationists need a species definition which allows them to work, regardless of the theoretical difficulties. If species were fixed and clearly distinct from one another, there would be no problem, but evolutionary processes cause species to change continually, and to grade into one another.

 

The species problem is the set of questions that arises when biologists attempt to define what a species is. Such a definition is called a species concept; there are at least 26 recognized species concepts.[1] A species concept that works well for sexually reproducing organisms such as birds is useless for species that reproduce asexually, such as bacteria. The scientific study of the species problem has been called microtaxonomy.[2]

 

One common, but sometimes difficult, question is how best to decide which species an organism belongs to, because reproductively isolated groups may not be readily recognizable, and cryptic species may be present. There is a continuum from reproductive isolation with no interbreeding, to panmixis, unlimited interbreeding. Populations can move forward or backwards along this continuum, at any point meeting the criteria for one or another species concept, and failing others.

 

Many of the debates on species touch on philosophical issues, such as nominalism and realism, and on issues of language and cognition.

 

The current meaning of the phrase "species problem" is quite different from what Charles Darwin and others meant by it during the 19th and early 20th centuries.[3] For Darwin, the species problem was the question of how new species arose. Darwin was however one of the first people to question how well-defined species are, given that they constantly change.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#The_species_problem

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species_concept