Anonymous ID: b3cf1f Dec. 7, 2019, 5:31 p.m. No.7450904   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0956 >>0969 >>0997 >>1045 >>1100 >>1171

>>7450824

 

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

 

A.D. 1475

Trento, Italia.

 

The Strange, Sad Saga of Saint Simon of Trent

 

The Setting for the Crime

 

Trent (Trento in Italian) was no Eastern European backwater town full of ignorant kulaks. It was in 1475 already an old and beautiful northern Italian city, experiencing the height of Renaissance art and culture. It had universities and a highly educated professional class. It's people were of typically northern Italian stock, with a good dose of Alpine and German in the mix. Standards of literacy were high for the times. It was a Catholic city with many churches and devout religious people. Later in the 1500's it would host the famous Councils of Trent launching the Catholic Counter-Reformation against the encroachments of Protestantism. It was a clean, healthful, prosperous city growing and expanding in trade, culture and the arts. Trent was a comfortable place to live the good life of Renaissance times.

 

A Baby Boy Dissapeared

 

The cultured citizens were shocked when a thirty-month-old boy, Simon, disappeared. Just as in child abduction cases today, the parents and citizenry went through a period of shock and disbelief as efforts to find the boy failed. Perhaps, they hoped, he had only been disobedient, and went off somewhere to play with other children. As the time grew later and later, another kind of shock and terror took hold as they began to realize that any chance of finding the boy alive was fast fading away. The parents of little SImon must have felt awful. They were both away from home when the child went missing, perhaps attending Holy Week services. What terrible anguish and misgivings were felt by these frightened parents? If you have ever had a child or loved a child, you can place yourself in this horrid situation.

 

It seems that Simon played outside after hte family dinner, last seen sitting on the front steps of his home. Later testimony revealed that he was approached by one Tobias, a Jewish resident of Trent. Tobias was no ordinary citizen. He was a doctor, a surgeon to be exact, skilled in the use of knives and blades. Tobias became friendly with the boy, eventually picking him up and bearing him away to the house of a co-conspirator, one Samuel. Simon was not seen alive again. This all happened on 21 March 1475 on a Thursday. To be precise, it was Maundy Thursday of Holy Week- and it was also Passover. The crime, occuring as it did during this high holy season, attracted much attention. Eventually the focus of public attention fell upon the Jews. They were seen with the lad, and the full story soon unfolded. In a curious development, the body was "discovered" by some of the Jews in the river. This may have been a tactical move by the cult to go ahead and let the body be found, hopefully directing attention away from them. [Compare with teh Tizsa-Eszlar Case of 1882] After all, if they found the boys body in the water, then he probably drowned accidentally as the not yet three-year-old could not swim. If believed, then a funeral would be the end of it- or so they hoped.

 

Poor Simon's body was in the Adige River that flowed not far from the house of the co-conspirator, Samuel. The matter was not handled so easily. The boy's naked body had singular and extraordinary wounds and incisions. The child also showed recent signs of circumcision! Further examination showed that the body was almost completely bloodless. It was clear that he had not drowned.

 

What Really Happened to Little Simon?

 

Charged along with Dr. Tobias were seven other conspirators: Samuel (whos home was the crime scene); two twin brothers named Saligman; Vitalis (or Veitel); Moses; Israel and Mayr. Because of the religious ritual circumstances of the killing, Bishop Hinderbach of the Diocese of Trent presided over the trial. A thorough investigation and interrogation ensued, albeit some of it under judicial torture. Soon the disgusting, sorded details of this unspeakable crime emerged. According to the confessions of his abusers, Simon suffered greatly at their hands. All the tortures, including the slow exsanguination, happened whil the child was alive and aware! The old records contain the genuinely frightening and graphic details, which are truly repelling to most readers. We have chosen Sir Richard Burton's casenotes for this account. His scholarship and thoroughness in research are undisputed and exemplified in the quotation.

 

WILL CONTINUE IN PART 2

Anonymous ID: b3cf1f Dec. 7, 2019, 5:32 p.m. No.7450956   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0969 >>0997 >>1045 >>1100 >>1171

>>7450824

>>7450904

 

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

 

Part 2

 

"The jews of Trent, by means of one of their number, a physician, decoyed to his house while the Christians were at church, it being Maundy Thursday, a boy two and a half years old, by name Simon, the son of a tanner. Before the Pachal festival commenced, the principal Jews collected in a room near their synagogue. The child, gagged with a kerchief, was extended in the form of a cross, and held down by his murderers. The blood, pouring from heavy gashes, was collected in a basin, and when death drew near the victim was placed upon his legs by the two men, and the others pierced his body with sharp instruments, all vying in brutality and enjoying the torture. The corpse having been found in the Etsch River [called Adige in Italian], which flows through the city, led to the detection of the crime; the murderers were put to death, the synagogue was razed to the ground, and a church was built over the place where the horrid deed was done. A sculpture was put on the Bridge Tower in Frankfort-on-the-Maine, and a picture of a Christian infant murdered by the Jews was placed in one of the galleries in the Hotel de Ville. Of late years it has been removed, in deference to the feelings of the Hebrew community, which of late years, has formed a large and important section of the commercial population. The murder has been abundantly commented upon. Dr. John Matthias Tiberinus, in Trent at the time, and Jacobus Philippus Bergamensis, of the Order of Hermits of St. Augustine, who was then living at the neighboring town of Beragamo, gave accounts of it; whilest an engraving was produced in the Chronicles of John Louis Gottfried, edited by Matthaeus Merianus."

 

-Sir Richard Burton in The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam,

pp 125-126

 

 

Fuller descriptions of the horrors suffered by Simon are available from the court records and later published accounts of the case.

 

The Trent Affair is plainly an example of a well-documented and proven ritual murder. It is one of the "multi-adjudicated" cases, that is, several kinds of courts and tribunals, including the Vatican, examined the evidence and all concurred in the findings. The original trial, presided over by Bishop Hinderbach, ended with a death senence. Jean de Salis de Brescia was the officer in charge of the inquiry. He brought in Jean de Feltro, a Jewish convert, who testified at length as to the reality of the charges. Another Jewish Christian convert, Wolfkan of Ratisbon, also testified to ritual blood magic.

 

The Jews of Trent went into a state of shock. This cosmopolitan city had no record of pogroms or anti-jewish violence. Jews had lived peacefully and profitably in Italy for centuries. Dr. Cecil Roth tells us:

 

"โ€ฆ On the whole, the condition of the Jews in Italy was enviable. It was, perhaps, the only country in Europe in which persecution was never elevated into a system. Mob outbreaks were rare, and in general, strictly localized.

 

"The Blood Accusation (notwithstanding the notorious case of Simon of Trent in 1475) was never widespread, and generally failed to secure official sanction โ€ฆ."

 

- Cecil Roth, History of the Jews, p. 238.

Anonymous ID: b3cf1f Dec. 7, 2019, 5:34 p.m. No.7450969   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0997 >>1045 >>1100 >>1171 >>1342

>>7450956

>>7450904

 

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

 

Part 3

 

This was essentially a proven case, and as Dr Roth (a jew) tells us, cannot be blamed on ignorance or naive anti-Jewish prejudices. Italy was not Poland. It had never really oppressed the Jews, lending even greater veracity to the case of Simon. The Trentine Jewish community, however, soon recovered from their initial shock, and began to resist the turn of events. Through bribery and pressure on the authorities, they gained a new trial. This tribunal sat in Ventimiglia, presided over by a respected jurist named Guidici. The verdict was the same. They confirmed the death sentences. But the rich, influential Jews of Trent did not stop there. Under howls of protest, the case came before Pope Sixtus IV. He appointed a respected canon lawyer, Father Panvino, to preside over a tribunal consisting of no less than six Cardinals. They too, confirmed the sentences, saying:

 

"The Hebrews killed the little boy Simon in order to obey a rabbinical religious law, their motive to serve a most wicked piety and devotion by obtaining Christian bloodโ€ฆ.."

[From a translation of the Tribunal records]

 

The verdict of the Papal Tribunal was the final coup de gras, and the appeals went no further. The controversy did not subside, and the decision caused deep resentment among the Jews. In the final stages, Dr. Tobias committed suicide and four others converted to Catholicism and received pardons.

 

 

Little Simon's Cause Is Taken to Heart by Devout Catholics

 

Yet the multi-adjucation continued through the beatification and canonization process of the Church. A cultus of devotion grew up around Simon, now known as a Child Martyr, killed because he was a Christian. his tomb was in the Church of St. Peter. Among the relics of the child saint were the sacrificial knife and other torture implements recovered from the cultists. The people of Trent made prayers and devotions beseeching his intercession. The local diocese declared him "venerable," the first step in the sainthood process. He became The Blessed Simon of Trent, Martyr. With Papal approval, masses and devotion were said in his name. By the time of the renaissance, canonization was a well-established procedure in the Church. The necessary claims of miracles went through complete and impassionate review before a final ruling. The whole process can sometimes take hundreds of years. In 1588 Pope Sixtus regularized the devotions to Simon, giving his full and unqualified approval. Later in February 1755, Pope Benedict XIV cited it in his work On The Canonization of Saints and issued the Bull Beatus Andreas, which gave full sanction and approval to the sainthood of Simon as well as the earlier martyr, Andreas of Rinn (see 1462). The reader may refer to Cardinal Ganganelli's Report to the Vatican on Ritual Murder (see 1758). In the late 1500's, Pope Gregory XIII visited and worshiped at St. Simon's Shrine during the Councils of Trent. During that time, hudnreds of Cardinals, Bishops and Priests must have visited all the parish churches of Trent, including St. Simon's tomb. This was a rarely disputed case. The church always affirmed the truth of the matterโ€ฆ

 

Saint Simon Dishonored and Disrespected

 

That is, until 1965. In that year in a stunning move, Archbishop Alessandro Gotardi of the Diocese of Trent, in a sacrificial gesture to "the prelates of political correctness" declared that the Jews were innocent. This culminated years of work and pressure from liberal historians, operating in the climate of "openness" and created by the Vatican II Council, presided over by "the ecumenical Pope," Paul VI. As a result of the decree of the Archbishop, the Vatican Congregation of Rites forbade the veneration of relics or the saying of masses in Simon's name.

 

This was an affront to the truth as well as a total depreciation of the five hundred years of prayer and devotion by devout Catholics to the little saint. yet even in this climate of liberalism, it became clear that the Vatican had no intention of opening any more records into ritual murder cases. Perhaps, though, the Jew and liberals were gratified with the Church's subside. maybe the church viewed de-canonization of too many saints at once as destabilizing. It's hard to say. The Jews and other ritual murder deniers celebrated a significant victory. One of the most famous and celebrated cases of all was overturned and expunged. Again, the genie was (mostly) back in the bottle.

Anonymous ID: b3cf1f Dec. 7, 2019, 5:36 p.m. No.7450997   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1045 >>1100 >>1171

>>7450969

>>7450956

>>7450904

 

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

 

PART 4

 

  • The following excerpt taken from "My Irrelevant Defence: On Jewish Ritual Murder by Arnold S. Leese (pp 18-19)

 

The Case of St. Simon of Trent. In 1475, a three-year-old boy named Simon disappeared in the Italian town of Trent; the circumstances were such that suspicion fell upon the Jews. Hoping to avert this suspicion, they themselves "found" the child's body in a conduit where they afterwards confessed to having thrown it. Examination of the body, however, revealed that the boy had not been drowned; there were strange wounds on the body, of circumcision and crucifixion. About seven Jews were arrested; they were tortured and confessed that the boy had been ritually murdered for the purpose of obtaining Christian blood to mix with the ceremonial unleavened bread; these confessions were made separately and agreed in all essential details. The Jews were tried and were ultimately executed. The officer in charge of the investigation of the crime, Jean de Salis de Brescia, had before him a converted Jew, Jean de Feltro, who described how his father told him that Jews of his town, Lanzhat, had killed a child at Passover to get the blood of which they partook in wine and cakes.

 

No one has ever dared to try and deny the historical events of this case; only the Jews invent "reasons" why it was not Ritual Murder! But there is no escape from the opposite conclusion. In 1759 in answer to a Jewish appeal from Poland, the Inquisition sent Cardinal Ganganelli (later he became Pope Clement XIV) to investigate and report on the whole subject, with particular reference to the many cases then being reported in Poland; although this man went out with a biased mind in favour of the Jews (in his report, he says: "With my weak faculties I endeavored to demonstrate the non-existence of the crime which was imputed to the Jewish nation in Poland," hardly the spirit in which to enter upon such an investigation!), he actually says of this Trent case (see Report of Cardinal Ganganelli, in C.Roth's The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935, p. 83): "I admit then as true the fact of the Blessed Simon, a boy three years old, killed by the Jews in Trent in the year 1475 in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ (although it is disputed by Basnage and Wagenseil); for the celebrated Flaminio Cornaro, a Venetian Senator, in his work On the Cult of the Child St. Simon of Trent(Venice, 1753) disposes of all the doubts raised by the above-mentioned critics."

 

The Jews try to throw discredit on the judges who condemned the Jewish murderers by quoting Pope Sixtus IV who refused to sanction the cult of St. Simon; but the reason for this was that the cult was not then authorized by Rome, but was a popular movement without authority and contrary to Church discipline;this same Pope later expressed his approval of the verdict on the Jews in the Papal Bull XII Kal. July, 1478.

 

We have not only the testimony as to the correctitude of the proceedings from Sixtus IV; but also that of several other Popes; such as Sixtus V, who regularized the popular cult of St. Simon by ratifying it in 1588, as cited by Benedict XIV in Book I, Ch. xiv, No. 4 of his On the Canonization of the Saints; also by this same Pope Benedict XIV in his Bull Beatus Andreas of 22nd February, 1755, in which he confirms Simon as a saint, a fact omitted from the arguments of that advocate for the Jews, Strack (The Jew and Human Sacrifice); Gregory XIII recognized Simon as a martyr, and even visited the shrine; and, as already stated, Clement XIV was obliged to recognize that it was a case of Jewish murder in hatred of Christianity.

 

St. Simon's shrine is in the Church of St. Peter, Trent; relics of him are still shown, among them the sacrificial knife.

 

In short, the Ritual Murder of St. Simon at Trent is supported by such evidence that those who doubt it are thereby condemning without reason high juridical and ecclesiastical authorities whose probity and intelligence there is not the slightest excuse to deny.

Anonymous ID: b3cf1f Dec. 7, 2019, 5:39 p.m. No.7451045   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1100 >>1171

>>7450997

>>7450969

>>7450956

>>7450904

 

PIZZAGATE == JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

 

thousands of years of history. Though many of us woke up around the time comet ping pong hit the internet, the fact is, jews have been abducting christian children, and torturing them to death, draining their body of all blood, which they drink raw and mix into passover bread.

 

These are literal vampires walking among you.