Anonymous ID: 17744d Dec. 7, 2019, 7:19 p.m. No.7452141   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2165 >>2193

Anybody remember that paper (CIA doc?) that said only 3% of a population has to be on board with an idea for it to become self-sustaining?

 

In that context, 10% bi-partisan positive opinion of Q is beyond critical mass.

Anonymous ID: 17744d Dec. 7, 2019, 7:23 p.m. No.7452174   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2189

>>7452145

Two more critical points. That wasn't just 10% awareness.

10% positive. Plus the guest was not pro-Q and he admitted the data shows significant bi-partisan distribution. For that to be true a significant amount of people that did NOT vote for Trump are now Q followers. He's talking about at least 5% of the country that know Q and have switched camps. By implication it proves what we already know… an even larger group has switched camps that don't know about Q, or aren't sure about Q.