>>7452185

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

A.D. 1475

Trento, Italia.

The Strange, Sad Saga of Saint Simon of Trent

The Setting for the Crime

Trent (Trento in Italian) was no Eastern European backwater town full of ignorant kulaks. It was in 1475 already an old and beautiful northern Italian city, experiencing the height of Renaissance art and culture. It had universities and a highly educated professional class. It's people were of typically northern Italian stock, with a good dose of Alpine and German in the mix. Standards of literacy were high for the times. It was a Catholic city with many churches and devout religious people. Later in the 1500's it would host the famous Councils of Trent launching the Catholic Counter-Reformation against the encroachments of Protestantism. It was a clean, healthful, prosperous city growing and expanding in trade, culture and the arts. Trent was a comfortable place to live the good life of Renaissance times.

A Baby Boy Dissapeared

The cultured citizens were shocked when a thirty-month-old boy, Simon, disappeared. Just as in child abduction cases today, the parents and citizenry went through a period of shock and disbelief as efforts to find the boy failed. Perhaps, they hoped, he had only been disobedient, and went off somewhere to play with other children. As the time grew later and later, another kind of shock and terror took hold as they began to realize that any chance of finding the boy alive was fast fading away. The parents of little SImon must have felt awful. They were both away from home when the child went missing, perhaps attending Holy Week services. What terrible anguish and misgivings were felt by these frightened parents? If you have ever had a child or loved a child, you can place yourself in this horrid situation.

It seems that Simon played outside after hte family dinner, last seen sitting on the front steps of his home. Later testimony revealed that he was approached by one Tobias, a Jewish resident of Trent. Tobias was no ordinary citizen. He was a doctor, a surgeon to be exact, skilled in the use of knives and blades. Tobias became friendly with the boy, eventually picking him up and bearing him away to the house of a co-conspirator, one Samuel. Simon was not seen alive again. This all happened on 21 March 1475 on a Thursday. To be precise, it was Maundy Thursday of Holy Week- and it was also Passover. The crime, occuring as it did during this high holy season, attracted much attention. Eventually the focus of public attention fell upon the Jews. They were seen with the lad, and the full story soon unfolded. In a curious development, the body was "discovered" by some of the Jews in the river. This may have been a tactical move by the cult to go ahead and let the body be found, hopefully directing attention away from them. [Compare with teh Tizsa-Eszlar Case of 1882] After all, if they found the boys body in the water, then he probably drowned accidentally as the not yet three-year-old could not swim. If believed, then a funeral would be the end of it- or so they hoped.

Poor Simon's body was in the Adige River that flowed not far from the house of the co-conspirator, Samuel. The matter was not handled so easily. The boy's naked body had singular and extraordinary wounds and incisions. The child also showed recent signs of circumcision! Further examination showed that the body was almost completely bloodless. It was clear that he had not drowned.

What Really Happened to Little Simon?

Charged along with Dr. Tobias were seven other conspirators: Samuel (whos home was the crime scene); two twin brothers named Saligman; Vitalis (or Veitel); Moses; Israel and Mayr. Because of the religious ritual circumstances of the killing, Bishop Hinderbach of the Diocese of Trent presided over the trial. A thorough investigation and interrogation ensued, albeit some of it under judicial torture. Soon the disgusting, sorded details of this unspeakable crime emerged. According to the confessions of his abusers, Simon suffered greatly at their hands. All the tortures, including the slow exsanguination, happened whil the child was alive and aware! The old records contain the genuinely frightening and graphic details, which are truly repelling to most readers. We have chosen Sir Richard Burton's casenotes for this account. His scholarship and thoroughness in research are undisputed and exemplified in the quotation.

WILL CONTINUE IN PART 2

>>7452185

>>7452308

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

Part 2

"The jews of Trent, by means of one of their number, a physician, decoyed to his house while the Christians were at church, it being Maundy Thursday, a boy two and a half years old, by name Simon, the son of a tanner. Before the Pachal festival commenced, the principal Jews collected in a room near their synagogue. The child, gagged with a kerchief, was extended in the form of a cross, and held down by his murderers. The blood, pouring from heavy gashes, was collected in a basin, and when death drew near the victim was placed upon his legs by the two men, and the others pierced his body with sharp instruments, all vying in brutality and enjoying the torture. The corpse having been found in the Etsch River [called Adige in Italian], which flows through the city, led to the detection of the crime; the murderers were put to death, the synagogue was razed to the ground, and a church was built over the place where the horrid deed was done. A sculpture was put on the Bridge Tower in Frankfort-on-the-Maine, and a picture of a Christian infant murdered by the Jews was placed in one of the galleries in the Hotel de Ville. Of late years it has been removed, in deference to the feelings of the Hebrew community, which of late years, has formed a large and important section of the commercial population. The murder has been abundantly commented upon. Dr. John Matthias Tiberinus, in Trent at the time, and Jacobus Philippus Bergamensis, of the Order of Hermits of St. Augustine, who was then living at the neighboring town of Beragamo, gave accounts of it; whilest an engraving was produced in the Chronicles of John Louis Gottfried, edited by Matthaeus Merianus."

-Sir Richard Burton in The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam,

pp 125-126

Fuller descriptions of the horrors suffered by Simon are available from the court records and later published accounts of the case.

The Trent Affair is plainly an example of a well-documented and proven ritual murder. It is one of the "multi-adjudicated" cases, that is, several kinds of courts and tribunals, including the Vatican, examined the evidence and all concurred in the findings. The original trial, presided over by Bishop Hinderbach, ended with a death senence. Jean de Salis de Brescia was the officer in charge of the inquiry. He brought in Jean de Feltro, a Jewish convert, who testified at length as to the reality of the charges. Another Jewish Christian convert, Wolfkan of Ratisbon, also testified to ritual blood magic.

The Jews of Trent went into a state of shock. This cosmopolitan city had no record of pogroms or anti-jewish violence. Jews had lived peacefully and profitably in Italy for centuries. Dr. Cecil Roth tells us:

"… On the whole, the condition of the Jews in Italy was enviable. It was, perhaps, the only country in Europe in which persecution was never elevated into a system. Mob outbreaks were rare, and in general, strictly localized.

"The Blood Accusation (notwithstanding the notorious case of Simon of Trent in 1475) was never widespread, and generally failed to secure official sanction …"

- Cecil Roth, History of the Jews, p. 238.

>>7452185

>>7452308

>>7452315

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

Part 3

This was essentially a proven case, and as Dr Roth (a jew) tells us, cannot be blamed on ignorance or naive anti-Jewish prejudices. Italy was not Poland. It had never really oppressed the Jews, lending even greater veracity to the case of Simon. The Trentine Jewish community, however, soon recovered from their initial shock, and began to resist the turn of events. Through bribery and pressure on the authorities, they gained a new trial. This tribunal sat in Ventimiglia, presided over by a respected jurist named Guidici. The verdict was the same. They confirmed the death sentences. But the rich, influential Jews of Trent did not stop there. Under howls of protest, the case came before Pope Sixtus IV. He appointed a respected canon lawyer, Father Panvino, to preside over a tribunal consisting of no less than six Cardinals. They too, confirmed the sentences, saying:

"The Hebrews killed the little boy Simon in order to obey a rabbinical religious law, their motive to serve a most wicked piety and devotion by obtaining Christian blood….."

[From a translation of the Tribunal records]

The verdict of the Papal Tribunal was the final coup de gras, and the appeals went no further. The controversy did not subside, and the decision caused deep resentment among the Jews. In the final stages, Dr. Tobias committed suicide and four others converted to Catholicism and received pardons.

Little Simon's Cause Is Taken to Heart by Devout Catholics

Yet the multi-adjucation continued through the beatification and canonization process of the Church. A cultus of devotion grew up around Simon, now known as a Child Martyr, killed because he was a Christian. his tomb was in the Church of St. Peter. Among the relics of the child saint were the sacrificial knife and other torture implements recovered from the cultists. The people of Trent made prayers and devotions beseeching his intercession. The local diocese declared him "venerable," the first step in the sainthood process. He became The Blessed Simon of Trent, Martyr. With Papal approval, masses and devotion were said in his name. By the time of the renaissance, canonization was a well-established procedure in the Church. The necessary claims of miracles went through complete and impassionate review before a final ruling. The whole process can sometimes take hundreds of years. In 1588 Pope Sixtus regularized the devotions to Simon, giving his full and unqualified approval. Later in February 1755, Pope Benedict XIV cited it in his work On The Canonization of Saints and issued the Bull Beatus Andreas, which gave full sanction and approval to the sainthood of Simon as well as the earlier martyr, Andreas of Rinn (see 1462). The reader may refer to Cardinal Ganganelli's Report to the Vatican on Ritual Murder (see 1758). In the late 1500's, Pope Gregory XIII visited and worshiped at St. Simon's Shrine during the Councils of Trent. During that time, hudnreds of Cardinals, Bishops and Priests must have visited all the parish churches of Trent, including St. Simon's tomb. This was a rarely disputed case. The church always affirmed the truth of the matter…

Saint Simon Dishonored and Disrespected

That is, until 1965. In that year in a stunning move, Archbishop Alessandro Gotardi of the Diocese of Trent, in a sacrificial gesture to "the prelates of political correctness" declared that the Jews were innocent. This culminated years of work and pressure from liberal historians, operating in the climate of "openness" and created by the Vatican II Council, presided over by "the ecumenical Pope," Paul VI. As a result of the decree of the Archbishop, the Vatican Congregation of Rites forbade the veneration of relics or the saying of masses in Simon's name.

This was an affront to the truth as well as a total depreciation of the five hundred years of prayer and devotion by devout Catholics to the little saint. yet even in this climate of liberalism, it became clear that the Vatican had no intention of opening any more records into ritual murder cases. Perhaps, though, the Jew and liberals were gratified with the Church's subside. maybe the church viewed de-canonization of too many saints at once as destabilizing. It's hard to say. The Jews and other ritual murder deniers celebrated a significant victory. One of the most famous and celebrated cases of all was overturned and expunged. Again, the genie was (mostly) back in the bottle

>>7452185

>>7452308

>>7452315

>>7452319

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

PART 4

• The following excerpt taken from "My Irrelevant Defence: On Jewish Ritual Murder by Arnold S. Leese (pp 18-19)

The Case of St. Simon of Trent. In 1475, a three-year-old boy named Simon disappeared in the Italian town of Trent; the circumstances were such that suspicion fell upon the Jews. Hoping to avert this suspicion, they themselves "found" the child's body in a conduit where they afterwards confessed to having thrown it. Examination of the body, however, revealed that the boy had not been drowned; there were strange wounds on the body, of circumcision and crucifixion. About seven Jews were arrested; they were tortured and confessed that the boy had been ritually murdered for the purpose of obtaining Christian blood to mix with the ceremonial unleavened bread; these confessions were made separately and agreed in all essential details. The Jews were tried and were ultimately executed. The officer in charge of the investigation of the crime, Jean de Salis de Brescia, had before him a converted Jew, Jean de Feltro, who described how his father told him that Jews of his town, Lanzhat, had killed a child at Passover to get the blood of which they partook in wine and cakes.

No one has ever dared to try and deny the historical events of this case; only the Jews invent "reasons" why it was not Ritual Murder! But there is no escape from the opposite conclusion. In 1759 in answer to a Jewish appeal from Poland, the Inquisition sent Cardinal Ganganelli (later he became Pope Clement XIV) to investigate and report on the whole subject, with particular reference to the many cases then being reported in Poland; although this man went out with a biased mind in favour of the Jews (in his report, he says: "With my weak faculties I endeavored to demonstrate the non-existence of the crime which was imputed to the Jewish nation in Poland," hardly the spirit in which to enter upon such an investigation!), he actually says of this Trent case (see Report of Cardinal Ganganelli, in C.Roth's The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935, p. 83): "I admit then as true the fact of the Blessed Simon, a boy three years old, killed by the Jews in Trent in the year 1475 in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ (although it is disputed by Basnage and Wagenseil); for the celebrated Flaminio Cornaro, a Venetian Senator, in his work On the Cult of the Child St. Simon of Trent(Venice, 1753) disposes of all the doubts raised by the above-mentioned critics."

The Jews try to throw discredit on the judges who condemned the Jewish murderers by quoting Pope Sixtus IV who refused to sanction the cult of St. Simon; but the reason for this was that the cult was not then authorized by Rome, but was a popular movement without authority and contrary to Church discipline;this same Pope later expressed his approval of the verdict on the Jews in the Papal Bull XII Kal. July, 1478.

We have not only the testimony as to the correctitude of the proceedings from Sixtus IV; but also that of several other Popes; such as Sixtus V, who regularized the popular cult of St. Simon by ratifying it in 1588, as cited by Benedict XIV in Book I, Ch. xiv, No. 4 of his On the Canonization of the Saints; also by this same Pope Benedict XIV in his Bull Beatus Andreas of 22nd February, 1755, in which he confirms Simon as a saint, a fact omitted from the arguments of that advocate for the Jews, Strack (The Jew and Human Sacrifice); Gregory XIII recognized Simon as a martyr, and even visited the shrine; and, as already stated, Clement XIV was obliged to recognize that it was a case of Jewish murder in hatred of Christianity.

St. Simon's shrine is in the Church of St. Peter, Trent; relics of him are still shown, among them the sacrificial knife.

In short, the Ritual Murder of St. Simon at Trent is supported by such evidence that those who doubt it are thereby condemning without reason high juridical and ecclesiastical authorities whose probity and intelligence there is not the slightest excuse to deny.

PIZZAGATE == JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

Thousands of years of history. Though many of us woke up around the time comet ping pong hit the internet, the fact is, jews have been abducting christian children, and torturing them to death, draining their body of all blood, which they drink raw and mix into passover bread.

These are literal vampires walking among you.

>>7452185

Just a small taste of whats to come.

Q turned the heat up on your yiddish asses today.

It's only the beginning.

See you next time, kikes. Get your asses to work.

>>7452433

Well i'll be a blue gophers dick

>>7452185

A.D. 1144

Norwich, England

The famouse case in England was the first recorded accusation of Jewish ritual murder in Europe and the British Isles. The death of young William led to his canonization. He was one of the most popular saints in English medieval history. Pilgrims traveled great distances under then-dangerous conditions to pray at his shrine and tomb. Though controversial in our politically correct times, devotions continued to St. William. He featured, albeit tentatively, in The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church.

On 20 March 1144, a short time before Passover and Easter, Wiliam, the son of a peasant landowner, disappeared. His body was found in a wooded area with countless cuts and stab wounds, rumors abounded, and the Jews eventually came under accusation. Official charges never came even after two maidservants testified that they witnessed the murder. Charges of sacrilege, however, came from an ecclesiastical court. Riots and public disorder loomed, so the sheriff of Norwich placed the Jews under protective custody. He claimed they were the property of the King, a common legal concept in those times. The brave sheriff may also have received some bribe money, and undoubtedly saw an opportunity to ingratiate himself with the royal authorities by protecting "the King's Jews." As time went on, the church grew skeptical, and the proceedings came to a virtual halt. The matter remained adjudicated and the case unsolved, but not in the minds of the people who strongly felt William had died a martyr's death for his Christian faith. A monk favorable to the popular cultus became Bishop of Norwich, encouraging devotions and pilgrimages. Great healings and other miracles soon occurred. You can read more about this popular medival English saint in older editions of Butler's Lives of the Saints and in the Penguin Dictionary of Saints.

The following quotations come from Jacob Marcus's The Jew in the Medieval World, in which the author quotes from The Life and Miracles of Saint William of Norwich, a Latin work written about 1173 by Thomas of Monmouth, a contemporary of the events he relates. The story of the ritual murder of the boy William in 1144 is virtually the first of a long series of such accusations, a series that has not yet come to an end. The significance of these accusations is that by such descriptions of the Jew they have served throughout the ages to create an anti-Jewish mentality. Generations have believed that no Christian child was safe in Jewish hands. Hundreds of Jews have been imprisoned, killed, or burnt alive on this charge, yet it is equally true that in number instances the accusation of ritual murder was not made except with the vigorous support of the local church authorities.

"In the specific case of William of Norwich, the evidence, critically sifted, leads one to believe that he actually existed and that his body was found after he had died a violent death. Everything beyond this, however, is in the realm of speculation."

>>7452185

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

William of Norwich continued

Marcus' writing conveys more than a whiff of the kind of moral anesthesia that usually accompanies Jewish treatments of ritual murder, in which mitigating doubts are magnified and in which any residual suspicion of evil is transferred from the one who commits it to the one who reports on it. The intent of such verbiage is to portray the criminal as the victim, the alarm raiser as the criminal. The following is from Thomas of Monmouth's book:

"When therefore he was flourishing in this blessed boyhood of his, and had attained to his eighth year (about 1140), he was entrusted to the skinners (furriers) to be taught their craft….Now while he was staying at Norwich, the Jews who were settled there and required their cloaks or their robes or other garments to be repaired, preferred him before all other skinners…. Or, as I rather believe, because of the ordering of Divine Providence he had been predestined to martyrdom from the beginning of time… and gradually step by step was drawn on, and chosen to be made a mock of and to be put to death by the Jews, in scorn of the Lord's Passion, as one of the little foresight, and so the more fit for them….

"So it came to pass that the holy boy, ignorant of the treachery that had been planned, had frequent dealings with the Jews; he was taken to task… and he was prohibited from going in and out among them any more. But the Jews, annoyed at the thwarting of their designs, tried with all their might to patch up a new scheme of wickedness, and all the more vehemently as the day for carrying out the crime that they had determined drew near….

"Accordingly, collecting all the cunning of their crafty plots, they found– I am not sure whether he was a Christian or a Jew– a man who was a most treacherous fellow and just the fitting person for carrying out their execrable crime, and with all haste– for their Passover was coming on in three days– they sent him to find out and bring back with him the victim…

"When he was found, he got round him with cunning wordy tricks, and so deceived him with his lying promises….

Then the boy, like an innocent lamb, was led to the slaughter. He was treated kindly by the Jews at first, and, ignorant of what was being prepared for him, he was kept till the morrow. But on the next day (Tuesday, March 21), which in that year was the Passover for them, after the singing of the hymns appointed for the day in the synagogue, the chiefs of the Jews… suddenly seized hold of the boy William as he was having his dinner and in no fear of any treachery, and illtreated him in various horrible ways. For while some of them held him behind, others opened his mouth and introduced an instrument of torture which was called a teazle (a wooden gag), and, fixing it by the straps through both jaws to the back of his neck, they fastened it with a knot as tightly as could be drawn.

"[more knots were made, severely constricting his neck and head, and the instrument of torture was complete.]… and there they finished off this dreadful engine of torture in a fifth knot.

"But not even yet could the cruelty of the torturers be satisfied without the adding even more severe pains. Having shaved his head, they stabbed it with countless thorn points, and made the blood come horribly from the wounds they made [as in Jesus' crown of thorns]. And so cruel were they and so eager to inflict pain that it was difficult to say whether they were mroe cruel or ingenious in their tortures. For their skill in torturing kept up the strength of their cruelty and ministered arms thereto.

"And thus while these enemies of the Christian name were rioting in the spirit of malignity around the boy, some of those present adjudged him to be fixed to a cross in mockery of the Lord's Passion, as though they would say; Even as we condemned the Christ to a shameful death, so let us also condemn the Christian, so that, uniting the Lord and his servant in a like punishment, we may retort upon themselves the pain and reproach which they impute to us.

"….They next laid their blood-stained hands upon the innocent victim, and having lifted him from the ground and fastened him upon the cross, the yvied with one another in their efforts to make an end of him..

>>7452574

>>7452185

>>7452564

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

William of norwich continued

"And we, after enquiring into the matter very diligently, did both find the house, and discovered some most certain marks in it of what had been done there. … there was instead of a cross a post set up between two other posts, and a beam stretched across the midmost post and attached to the other on either side. And as we afterwards discovered, from the marks of the wounds and of the bands, the right hand and foot had been tightly bound and fastened with cords, but the left hand and foot were pierced with two nails. Now the deed was done in this way, lest it should be discovered, from the presence of nail-marks in both hands and both feet, that the murderers were Jews and not Christians, if eventually the body was found. Both hands and feet were not nailed lest it look like a crucifixion.

"But while in doing these things they were adding pang to pang and wound to wound, and yet were not able to satisfy their heartless cruelty and their inborn hatred of the Christian name, lo! after all these many and great tortures, they inflicted a frightful wound in his left side, reaching even to his inmost heart, and, as though to make an end to it all, they extinguished his mortal life so far as it was in their power, (Jesus was similarly pierced by a lance whil nailed to the cross. The chronicler here imitates the Apostle John's narrative.) And since many streams of blood were running down from all parts of his body, then, to stop the blood and to wash and close the wounds, they poured boiling water over him.

"Thus then the glorious boy and martyr of Christ, William, dying the death of time in reproach of the Lord's death, but crowned with the blood of a glorious martyrdom, entered into the kingdom of glory…. (St. William after his death worked many miracles that brought streams of people).

"As a proof of the truth and credibility of the matter we now adduce something which we ahave heard from the lips of Theobold, who once was a Jew, and afterwards a monk. He verily told us that in the ancient writings of his fathers it was written that the Jews, without the shedding of human blood, could neither obtain their freedom, nor could they ever return to their fatherland. Hence it was laid down by them in ancient times that every year they must sacrifice a Christian in some part of the world…. in scorn and contempt of Christ, that so they might avenge their sufferings on him…. (The Jews rejected Jesus and were as a result punished by exile from Palestine, Angry, they took revenge by secretly crucifying Christians– thus Theobold. This libel is reminiscent of Apion, an alexandrian writer of the first century.)

"Wherefore the chiefe men and RAbbis of the JEws who dwell in spain… and cast lots… and hatever country the lot falls upon, its metropolis has to carry out the same method with the other towns and cities, and the place whos lot is drawn has to fulfill the duty imposed…

"Now in that year… the lot fell upon the Norwich Jews."

- As quoted in Marcus, Jacob, The Jew In The Medieval World, pp. 121 - 125

Modern-Day Recognition of the Norwich Case

The venerable and respected Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church carried a suprisingly revealing entry for St. William of Norwich. The allegations and facts of the case are honestly and clearly summarized.

"WILLIAM OF NORWICH, St. (1132-1144), supposed victim of a Jewish ritual murder. A tanner's apprentice at Norwich, he was enticed from home on Monday in Holy Week 1144 and on Holy Saturday, six days later, his body was found with marks of violence in a neighbouring wood. Acc. to Thomas of Monmouth, a monk of orwich and the only authority for the legend, William had been crucified and murdered by the Jews during the Passover. The story was substantiated by a converted Jew, Theobald, who asserted that acc. to Jewish religious tradition, a Christian must e sacrificied every year to obtain the deliverance of the people. This is the first known case of the blood accusation against the Jews; but as the authorities took no action, the account is open to suspicion.

"The cult of William of Norwich dates from the translation of his body from the chapter-house of the monks, where it had been buried, to the cathedral (1151) amidst a wave of religious enthusiasm. Many visions and miracles were reported to have taken place his tomb, and throughout the Middle Ages he enjoyed great popularity. Feast Day at Norwich, 26 Mar.; commemoration elsewhere, 25 Mar."

>>7452574

>>7452185

>>7452564

>>7452584

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

William of Norwich continued

Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge,confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine, and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.

In J. C. Cox's Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47, as also in the Victoria Country History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II, is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder of St.William, the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the Power of Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual Murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew(1935) says: "Modern enquirers,after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives." How these modern enquiries arrived at a conclusion like that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side. And why the relatives

should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

John Foxe's Acts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich,was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography(edited by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this Ritual Murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage. -

Jewish Ritual Murder, Arnold Lease

.

>>7452185

JESUS WAS NOT A JEW

Wake up anons. Remember who you are.

>>7452504

take it out if you want, cuck. I don't give a fuck. Speak the truth. It's your soul not mine.