Anonymous ID: 922b5d Dec. 8, 2019, 8:59 a.m. No.7455897   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5905 >>5922 >>5929 >>5956

anons lawfag here

will NEVER forget this book i spent dozens of hours studying this book

worked so hard i got the high grade in conlaw class = only time in 3 years did that

looking bak i realize i did so cuz IT MADE NO SENSE

i now realize it should be titled "unconstitional law" as it is packed with LIES and glorifies every wrong decision SCOTUS ever made for the DS libtard prog agenda

just WOW it is evil propaganda

and for reference that was 1978 so yeah its been goin on a long long time

fuk him and fuk harvard

Anonymous ID: 922b5d Dec. 8, 2019, 9:05 a.m. No.7455927   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5936

>>7455905

not libel concept itself which is OK but the absurd EXCEPTIONS and RULES created by courts which fuk up the whole idea and are applied inconsistently and arbitrarily by shitty judges or for political purposes

Anonymous ID: 922b5d Dec. 8, 2019, 9:08 a.m. No.7455944   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7455929

gud point anon - or alt analogy is referee

juries of citizens should decide most issues based on common sense and community standards

massive laws and regs NOT required or helpful