Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 8, 2019, 12:05 p.m. No.7457035   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7046 >>7050

She was VERY emphatic about the bracelet - I thought it was a watch. She went out of her way to highlight that bracelet in an unmistakable way.

Can't blow up that bracelet enough to tell what it is though. Anyone get a good pic of the bracelet?

 

>>7456810

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 8, 2019, 12:08 p.m. No.7457058   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7073 >>7078 >>7087

As always, I'll be here. By the way, it's different here now somehow. Same idiots sliding all the can, but the research seems to die off more quickly. Q posts, people analyze immediately, and then it all dies out faster than it had in the past.

 

My imagination or is it all more laid back now?

 

>>7456851

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 8, 2019, 12:14 p.m. No.7457092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7133

Insane how many times anons have gotten wrapped around a hard date they've settled on only to see it flutter past us silently. The IG report is simply the tip of the sword though. Regardless of what it states, it's Horowitz's testimony on Wednesday that will sketch out what it means and pave the way for the next report (that needs to be indisputably damning to the coup participants). Whether damning or benign it's only the first big salvo. Durham is driving the main attack.

 

>>7456886

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 8, 2019, 12:21 p.m. No.7457149   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7160 >>7170

Had a thought about that. Are we sure THIS is the board for real research? I just use the onion access and really can't be sure if this board is still the real place to coordinate my research. Where are all the placeholders? You know, the read only section that we had and were waiting for Q to fill in.

 

>>7457078

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 8, 2019, 12:48 p.m. No.7457332   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7352 >>7371

That's the difference then. I don't consider FBIAnon and Meganon as Q.

 

Q is Q and any other accounts or posters are not Q. Megaanon and FBIAnon did not provided any indisputable proofs that I can recall.

 

No big deal, just curious.

 

>>7457283

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 8, 2019, 12:58 p.m. No.7457402   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7428

There is a case to be made for sure. I just like to keep it clean. To me, Q#1 is the start of Q. Meganon and FBIAnon were precursors to me.

Nothing wrong with them (good info) but they're just not Q. I jumped into 4Chan during Oct 2017 and had to sort out the 3 posters that were active then. Also recall some Reddit postings by hte other 2. Seemed to me then that Q was the primary info source (lead actor) and the other 2 were supporting roles.

 

Still no big deal, just a way to mentally categorize.

 

>>7457352

>(You)