And the Santorini one? Isn't that scheduled too?
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/12/08/leaks-suggest-labour-not-dealing-antisemites-simon-wiesenthal-center-party-number-threat-jews/
the comments to this article are interesting where there is a debate about the 'power' of the '. . . . '
I went there this morning by habit and then said 'what am I doing here.' and then deleted the link.
should I make a new link?
do you think it's still worth reading ?
I posited in a post last week that Kerry is Biden's handler, and then today there is an article in the Boston Herald about Kerry and Biden being together in New Hampshire lately.
While I loath that girl, because she has no control and seems a bit possessed, there is a real person there.
She can be woken up and she can tell the voices in her head to STFU.
his statements elevate the problems and 'give them energy'
he says it 'shatters' 'all' 'good and beautiful' 'ideas'
ideas are knowledge, Knowledge is gnosis.
listen: it might share some ideas, and maybe some good-looking or smart ones, but it isn't an all powerful hammer with which evil people destroy the world.
but he gives it that power.
why make up excuses.
you ask questions that you know the answers to.
If you don't think you are responsible then I don't know what to tell you.
The part about what you 'believe'?
what does it matter what you think you believe in the day to day life here, you have to follow the law as it is and do as much as you can to skirt through the pitfalls of bad laws.
your rethoric is polemical and useless here, becuase you are giving a mentoring dialog of a teacher, but there isn't any way for you to make sure that those who you are mentoring understand the message that you are trying to convey.
when you start speaking in a meta-language of epistomoligical mentoring . . . you weave webs of 'concept' within the reflections. Take away the mirrors and it's all nothing.
You are responsible for your actions.
What you 'believe?' if you don't tell anyone what that is, how will they ever know?
try answering your own questions.
I suggest that one not put out these stupid meta-language conundroms without being dedicated to saying that it's a polemic, just a tactic, there is no 'meat' to that discussion.
when one speaks in that kind of meta-language you seem to lack real ideas as if the only purpose is to sow confusion.
I think that it is a fair question.
Does that anon think Drudge is still worth reading?
How would I know that?
the gaslighting cunundrum making meta-languague talker and his psuedo-zen diatribes.
If I ask him to
"make me one with everything!"
he'll hand me a hotdog with all the fixings.
TY.
good point, and that's concise.
I didn't want to start a flame war.
there is an expectation that these breads will be well traversed today by very very many eyeballs.
and with the rolling of a 5-C's diatribe by the faker-pope where he displays his lack of faith by suggesting 'concrete' (lay not one stone upon the other . . . ) . . .
when the time comes and Q drops start blizzarding in, hopfully I won't be distracted by engaging in a flame war.
You provide the executive summary. !
ironic statement:
I know, huh! And all those days that they said free beer tomorrow, I really thought that there was going to be free beer . . .