dChan
Anonymous ID: 138ed1 March 21, 2018, 1:08 p.m. No.746896   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Anons,

 

I want to address the questions as to why somethings are taken out of the bread.

 

Most of what is taken out of the notable posts section are duplicates (articles etc. listed in multiple notable post sections) OR they are posts that, although well written, are simply an anons speculation and contains no sauce or poor saucing (ie: some guy on twitter with a lot of followers says…)

 

Also, a reoccurring shill tactic is to attempt to get misinformation or poorly sauced information into the bread and that's why you are seeing some anons very angry with bakers for removing certain posts. If you see something missing from notable posts section or you would like something added, if you can make sure to @baker and make sure it has good sources included in the post I will do my best to make sure it makes its way into the bread.

 

I am trying to walk the line of keep the standards of our research high and making sure anons are happy with how things are going.

 

Thank you.

 

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: 138ed1 March 21, 2018, 1:29 p.m. No.747082   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>747038

>>747046

>until evidence surfaces that SES is NOT part of the CIA

 

This is not how notable posts works. Maybe an SES board? I know there are probably good connections but until we find them we cannot just put every SES posts in the notables unless they are proving connections to Q related posts.

 

To comprimise, I will leave this one in since it is an actualy CIA doc, but going forward SES posts that go in the bread will need to show good connections.

Anonymous ID: 138ed1 March 21, 2018, 1:45 p.m. No.747234   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7436

>>747206

This is important for the [child] Sex Trafficking as well. I know CM and others here dont like it but it might be a very necessary step. Also, any IBOR may do a lot to protect our speech here and on social media.

Anonymous ID: 138ed1 March 21, 2018, 1:47 p.m. No.747261   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7268 >>7277 >>7287 >>7309

The FBI opened a case on “Q” today re: ‘Boom’ statements and now the TX bombings.

Coordinated to end comms here.

Predictable.

They are scared [4am].

They will fail.

We know the details.

[Wednesday].

Q

 

Sorry for being late on this, but they wont be able to shut down comms from Q here, right? He is just saying they will try?

 

Also, what is the [Wednesday] referring to?