Self empoyed. Not all of us are broke or have slave-drivers, I mean, bosses.
Trips confirm. Great bookmarks, btw
Why do you ask?
Confirmed
Wow, where to start?
MZ - Mark Zuckerberg
RT - Real Time (and/or Rizvi Traverse?)
late night meeting, confirmed by MSM that he's been working on a statement, recently released, I still haven't found in in the news cycle
5 politicians (idk who, check previous breads)
1 former intel dir (idk who, check previous breads)
Mask & spin - COVER UP
IDEN - https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDEN
MSM Narrative shift FAIL - self explanatory
We have the algorithm, Than k you @ snowden - see previous Q drops re: algorithm
Learn chess + the rest (self explanatory)
No man is a saint. Putin is Russia first, as he should be. POTUS is America First, as he should be. Neither is a holy man, and we shouldn't expect them to be. Understanding where they stand doesn't require admiration.
Coming up with the next dumb remarks, It'll take him/them a week or so.
Why thank you! I must have been digging into something else to have missed it 20 whole times.
Sigh. Does Q HAVE to mention something for us to consider things for ourselves? I'm not going to post ?s to Q all day or wait for confirmation to think for myself. Independent thinking still has value, hive mind or not. Again, ANOTHER "Possible" meaning aside from what Q has said directly, no sin there. Expanded thinking. I could be right, I could be wrong, and don't mind being wrong. you should try it sometime, it's liberating.
As for ALL SES being comped, that wasn't what I intended to imply. We've been told clearly that there's more good than bad. Same as with every other 3 letter agency. Don't be so literal, shows your limits of thought.
Yes, multiple meanings, thank you for expounding. Someanon pointed it out previous breads today. Thanks for not being an asshole about it like this guy >>747152
RE search can be RE-searched, and more can be discovered. Solved months ago does NOT mean that more can't be discovered. Stale minded know-it-all fucks, expand your thinking.
I agree with that. No entire organization (except for maybe the CIA?) can be labeled as either ALL good or ALL bad, that doesn't account for individuals within said organizations. Wasn't what I meant to imply earlier. I know how dangerous generalizations can be, which is what makes generalizing entire nations, races, religions etc, dangerous. There's actual people in each that must be judged on a case by case basis.
And, um, you believe mainstream media? How normie of you. You should take that argument to facebook, it'll go over really well there. Not here.
The cynic claiming to be a critical thinker is back, I see. Bless his heart.
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence kek.
Just because you or I haven't found it, doesn't mean that it does not exist. I have ZERO access to FBI files that were just opened, do you? Are you waiting for the MSM to tell us? How would you know exactly?
Just way that you don't yet know, I have no problem admitting that. Neither should you.