>>7472251
Q alludes to the US MIL being granted the same SAPs as the ABCs post 9/11. Q also alluded to the US MIL being engaged by the @POTUS in order to defend against this sort of ABC fuckery because those agencies would likely be coordinated/controlled in order to work against the Oval Office:
Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL No.147446992 📁
Nov 1 2017 00:11:52 (EST)
Note MI has the same SAPs as NSA, CIA etc as designated post 9-11.
Why is this relevant?
Who can be held hostage and controlled?
CIA thinks its foreign offshore assets are strong enough to defend against the US executive (not accounting for military use on domestic soil).
Why does the Constitution explicitly grant this authority to the President and what is it to prevent?
They knew our agencies would grow in power so much so they could/can hold the executive hostage or engage with bad actors.
Trump nominated someone new to direct every agency but one. He controls the top.
Having brain farts this morning. Aside from that, I'm not able to find a search term for a drop that alludes to ABCs outside of C_A being restructured/dismantled, etc. Just C_A. If FBI still operates a counterintel div, we won't need a C_A.
Theory:
I think the plan is to get FBI back to trustworthy status. Whatever public conflict is happening with Wray, whom we have nothing but evidence to suggest that he's good to go, then it's intentional, and going to lead to that org's redemption arc in the "movie".
Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 6380d3 No.1434041 📁
May 16 2018 15:25:07 (EST)
US History [ABCs]
SIS [FBI] C_A
Did the 'covert' counterintelligence branch of the FBI end?
Or, was it expanded into a new agency?
Double meanings exist.
SIS is good?
UK:US
US:UK
Q