>If they fail to impeach, the Senate can still call the same witnesses and introduce the evidence without the legitimate impeachment on the record.
WIN-WIN
She talks like a woe-man and walks like a man.
The IMPEACHMENT (charade) won't go to the Senate, true, but the Senate can still investigate.
I'm so tired of looking at this monkey.
Don't underestimate how powerful that would be.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
The price of admission here.
All three OK to vote in CA.
>And you can bet after the 2020 elections when the R's win WH, Senate, and the House false flags will be popping up all over the place.
Don't think so. Most of the finite ammo will be used up by then.
We've always had the lost 4-6%. What will be lacking/removed are the puppet handlers that make the weak ones do their bidding.
It takes minutes to shoot. Days to reload spent ammo. Not good math.
>why all the concern about Khashoggi
Because it's a way to drive a wedge between the US and Saudi Arabia.
>Also, he's 100% insulated with zero risk of impeachment (fact).
Being removed from office by impeachment.
Symbolism will be their downfall.
I know how impeachment works.
A two-step process. Starts in House (vote to impeach), then goes to Senate for trial. If convicted in Senate, out the door.
My comment went over your head.
It happens a lot here.
As you were.
Barr matters.
Lindsey Graham matters.
That wouldn't be wise.