I am not disputing that there are coincidences or that the “Comey/Corney” and other text anomalies are in any way insignificant to our research nor am I denying that it gives us additional items to look into however…

Due to the way they scanned this document at 150dpi with high compression, it is not a conspiracy nor is it intentionally done. However, these anomalies can still be used as a reference to Q posts and does indeed seem relevant, as we have found repeatedly, future proves past.

Here are the FACTS about scanning documents from a print production/graphic design/forensic document fag autist who has been in the industry for a long time, I’m an old grey beard at this point and I’m tired of seeing ignorant people harp on this, bread after bread, as if this were a conspiracy or done intentionally.

There is no "strange font substitution" within this report, period, full stop. OCR mis-identification of text is very common when converting a scanned document in an image format that is not good in resolution and full of compression artifacts. A better resolution for OCR conversion would be from a 300+ dpi, non-compressed image format. But at 476 pages the file would be much larger and not appropriate for download distribution.

NORMIE VERSION:

Upon a simple analysis of the document, anyone can discover that it is scanned in at 150 dpi with highest compression setting and no background suppression, on auto color detect, hence the color/grayscale scan :( Even by looking at just the file size, these specific setting can be inferred as well, based on years of experience doing this type of work. As you can see from this sample image taken from page 2 of the report (blue guides @0.1”, grid and black bar above for dpi reference), the baseline image that Acrobat has to work with for OCR looks like hammered ass. And for you id10ts that say, “Derpa… derpa… that’s not what it looks like on my screen you liar.” You are a stupid that can’t be fixed, as Adobe programs use filters and anti-aliasing to make crappy docs look better on your screen for reading.

AUTIST VERSION:

Additionally, the IG report, in this case, was printed out, comb bound, and then manually redacted with a permanent marker (see page 12 for the comb bound left edge). This method for redactions and distribution is VERY common and obvious to anyone who has looked over documents released by our government. That the comb bind type of scanning artifact is not on every page is not uncommon either. Typically when scanning a comb bound document you would specify about 0.4" or 0.5" scanning margin to eliminate this from appearing, however as these documents are scanned using mechanical means (i.e. from a Xerox copier) and this document being large, pages from a document will not always scan in perfectly aligned, less aligned if scanned in feeding the comb bound edge first. Slight shifting/page edge start does occur which is usually fixed up a bit with document processing and OCR being run.

Typically as my autism kicks in, for my customers I would have done 4 separate scans. One set at 300dpi and one set at 600 dpi both with less compression, sets of the color pages scanned in color with no background suppression, and sets of the B/W scanned in B/W with background suppression. I would have then combined the scan sets into 2 different PDF’s. One for download and one for print/OCR, both would be good for OCR, with higher the res, the more accurate the OCR. Mind you, preparing the documents this way is a bit more technical requiring a few extra steps, it produces very reasonable file sizes of MUCH better quality.

This is the government, does anyone think that they would take the time to perform these extra steps to get you autist grade OCR results… or would they just toss it in a copier, set it to auto detect color, 150dpi, highest compression, push green button, look at it digitally, click Optimize Scanned PDF then upload?

Please NOTABLE this… I say again, the anomalies can still be used as a reference to Q posts and does indeed seem relevant, as we have found repeatedly, future proves past. However, seeing ignorant people harp on this, bread after bread, as if this were a conspiracy or done intentionally, is super fucking with the OCD nature of my autism.

NORMIE VERSION:

Upon a simple analysis of the document, anyone can discover that it is scanned in at 150 dpi with highest compression setting and no background suppression, on auto color detect, hence the color/grayscale scan :( Even by looking at just the file size, these specific setting can be inferred as well, based on years of experience doing this type of work. As you can see from this sample image taken from page 2 of the report (blue guides @0.1”, grid and black bar above for dpi reference), the baseline image that Acrobat has to work with for OCR looks like hammered ass. And for you id10ts that say, “Derpa… derpa… that’s not what it looks like on my screen you liar.” You are a stupid that can’t be fixed, as Adobe programs use filters and anti-aliasing to make crappy docs look better on your screen for reading.

I am not disputing that there are coincidences or that the “Comey/Corney” and other text anomalies are in any way insignificant to our research nor am I denying that it gives us additional items to look into however…

AUTIST VERSION:

Due to the way they scanned this document at 150dpi with high compression, it is not a conspiracy nor is it intentionally done. However, these anomalies can still be used as a reference to Q posts and does indeed seem relevant, as we have found repeatedly, future proves past.

Here are the FACTS about scanning documents from a print production/graphic design/forensic document fag autist who has been in the industry for a long time, I’m an old grey beard at this point and I’m tired of seeing ignorant people harp on this, bread after bread, as if this were a conspiracy or done intentionally.

There is no "strange font substitution" within this report, period, full stop. OCR mis-identification of text is very common when converting a scanned document in an image format that is not good in resolution and full of compression artifacts. A better resolution for OCR conversion would be from a 300+ dpi, non-compressed image format. But at 476 pages the file would be much larger and not appropriate for download distribution.

Additionally, the IG report, in this case, was printed out, comb bound, and then manually redacted with a permanent marker (see page 12 for the comb bound left edge). This method for redactions and distribution is VERY common and obvious to anyone who has looked over documents released by our government. That the comb bind type of scanning artifact is not on every page is not uncommon either. Typically when scanning a comb bound document you would specify about 0.4" or 0.5" scanning margin to eliminate this from appearing, however as these documents are scanned using mechanical means (i.e. from a Xerox copier) and this document being large, pages from a document will not always scan in perfectly aligned, less aligned if scanned in feeding the comb bound edge first. Slight shifting/page edge start does occur which is usually fixed up a bit with document processing and OCR being run.

Typically as my autism kicks in, for my customers I would have done 4 separate scans. One set at 300dpi and one set at 600 dpi both with less compression, sets of the color pages scanned in color with no background suppression, and sets of the B/W scanned in B/W with background suppression. I would have then combined the scan sets into 2 different PDF’s. One for download and one for print/OCR, both would be good for OCR, with higher the res, the more accurate the OCR. Mind you, preparing the documents this way is a bit more technical requiring a few extra steps, it produces very reasonable file sizes of MUCH better quality.

This is the government, does anyone think that they would take the time to perform these extra steps to get you autist grade OCR results… or would they just toss it in a copier, set it to auto detect color, 150dpi, highest compression, push green button, look at it digitally, click Optimize Scanned PDF then upload?

Please NOTABLE this… I say again, the anomalies can still be used as a reference to Q posts and does indeed seem relevant, as we have found repeatedly, future proves past. However, seeing ignorant people harp on this, bread after bread, as if this were a conspiracy or done intentionally is super fucking with my OCD autism.

>>7473311

That's not true. Try this numb nuts… take the original IG report and extract page 2 or any page of the document. Convert it to an image file at whatever resolution you wish. Open it up in Acrobat and do an OCR run on it. You will get Comey converted into Corney everytime. You are just ignorant of OCR. Prove me wrong after you do this.

>>7473311

The OCR detects a close font to the text based on your Adobe settings. It's not intentional. Extract the images and run the OCR yourself.

>>7473311

The low resolution can also be checked by even a fag like you, save any page as an image using auto detect dpi (which will give you the orig doc res) and look at the crappy image. OCR also uses spell check references… Comey is a name that is not picked up by the spell check

>>7473311

If you think this is a slide then do the analysis yourself. Do the due diligence and extract the images yourself, any page, any resolution you wish and run OCR on the page.

>>7473311

You don't know jack about OCR, the new stuff uses spell check. Comey is not a dictionary word, hence the letter change.

You thinking this is a slide means that you just haven't done any diligent work to understand this.

>>7473353

That is amusing coming from someone who has not done the image analysis yourself. Do the due diligence and extract the images yourself, any page, any resolution you wish and run OCR on the page. The low resolution can also be checked by saving any page as an image using auto detect dpi (which will give you the orig doc res) and look at the crappy image. OCR also uses spell check references… Comey is a name that is not picked up by the spell check.

OCR also uses spell check references… Comey is a name that is not picked up by the spell check.

>>7473471

OCR also uses spell check references… Comey is a name that is not picked up by the spell check.

>>7473462

Modern OCR also uses spell check references… Comey is a name that is not picked up by the spell check. That is why other words like “government” are not changed.

>>7473514

Modern OCR also uses spell check references… Comey is a name that is not picked up by the spell check. That is why other words like “government” are not changed.

If you think this is a slide then do the analysis yourself. Do the due diligence and extract the images yourself, any page, any resolution you wish and run Adobe OCR on the page.

>>7473586

Modern OCR also uses spell check references… Comey is a name that is not picked up by the spell check. That is why other words like “government” are not changed.

If you think this is a slide then do the analysis yourself. Do the due diligence and extract the images yourself, any page, any resolution you wish and run Adobe OCR on the page. If you do that you will understand. Until you do that, think what you will, and believe others like the sheep you are. If you refuse to do the research yourself you deserve your id10t status.