All last bread)
He won't admit that he doesn't know for sure. Just came to a conclusion (or trying to make others come to a conclusion) with no evidence. Nice tactic there.
THANK YOU, some reading comprehension on the board! They twist up a few words and it's a whole new story. Nice game of Telephone. too bad it's as simple as going back to the post to see what it ACTUALLY said (pic definitely related)
An hour? Try a few or several hours between the alleged call to Austin PD after demanding that Q explain himself, and the time that Q posted. And, how do you see the relevance between a call to the Austin PD, and an alleged investigation by the FBI? Do you know for sure that they are related? Were you there when the Austin PD allegedly reported to the FBI? You guys are killing me with the twisted stories! kek
I didn't say it was true. I didn't say it was false. I did not make the claim. Q did. And still, I'll take the word of one who's confirmed themselves many times, over an anon making statements implying that since he didn't find anything, that there is nothing to find. A bit defeatist at best, an attempt to misdirect and/or confuse at worst. And even having said all that, until said FBI investigation ever surfaces for us to actually see with our own eyes, we simply DO NOT KNOW. There's nothing wrong with admitting that one does not know.It's liberating.