>>747630

You are REALLY an advocate of an incomplete spreadsheet, huh? We're still here, so there's still more digging to do anon. No answers are final because this is FAR from over. Reviews, reminders, and adding more data than was previously found don't hurt anything, except you feelings apparently. Researching and sticking to one and one answer alone, is what's lazy, because it implies that we have it ALL figured out. We don't. Admit it..

>>747765

We already know that people are idiot. Newfags coming to the board not knowing that it's heavily monitored may dox or incriminate themselves without a second thought. Hell, even some oldfags do it. That's why. Not about the research itself. And not about censoring. It's about OpSec.

>>747774

>Draining the Swamp: Monetary and Fiscal Policy Reform by Dr. Harvey F. Barnard

OR…

https:// archive.org/details/pdfy-26rkhN1b_IernzD2

>>747820

Please note:

disregard this if you're looking for the entire book. It's a summary at best

>>747903

True. All I'm saying is not to outright GIVE them a reason to even want to find.

>>747867

Listening now, thanks for the link

>>747743

The easy way:

Use qanon.pub to find the post, and follow the link to the original bread. That way you'r enot reading what's not relevant to your search.

Start there and read forward: https:// 8ch.net//qresearch/res/360029.html#360885

Yes, you can ask, but don't expect anons to be nice about it & GIVE you answers that they've earned. Some may, some won't. Not to be taken personally either way.

>>748003

And then the narrative shifted again. Said would shift the narrative, not immediately change people's minds. The MSM narrative fluid, of course it shifted only temprarily nothing surprising there.

>>748064

>thanks for the link anon, I certainly appreciate it

Don't be the asshole you claim to detest. All i did was tell it like it is. Not about keeping discoveries to self. The discoveries are in a public forum, easily searchable for those that have the will to. You could easily have followed the link that I took time out to provide, and gotten your answer, rather than reply to me, which tells me that you may not actually be here for research

While anons are working on A, you can ASK if they will help you with B, but if anon prefers to keep working on A, well, you need to find B yourself. Simple as that. Now, I'm going back to A, have fun looking up B.

>>748102

I gave the dude a direct link, he chose to argue. He could have followed the link and gotten the answer. So, tell me, what is his actual intention? see >>748111

>>748125

Mind your fucking business.

>>748268

And, not to be an ingrate. Simple concepts