Okay hold on, hold on. Consider this anons. Remember those times when POTUS added letters or mispelled words that we never fully figured out (on most). An extra letter here, an out of place letter there, etc.

I would be willing to bet that in those tweets there was someone mentioned and that extra letter or out of place letter is his way of giving us the cipher to placing it in. In other words, him saying "add an F", or "remove an L", something like that. If we are going to go down this road, and I will but later on nightshift as I am exhausted at moment, then I think it may be worth it to look at his clearly out of place added letters. So think of the decode like this:

Example: He tweets about Joe Blow

In same statement he adds an "S" to word that is out of place

New search: Joe Blows

Then cross reference all new name with all Q posts

Then WL

Then archived media collections

So on, so forth (not going to reveal exact research methods due to who reads these). POTUS has always been extremely sneaky with his methods and patterns and I could definitely see him doing this. It even sounds like something he would do.

>>7475200

Can you imagine how many people have truly been harmed due to these fraud tweets. Consider that for a moment. They do not have any "source", they never check into it to confirm, they just kick it out because they know nothing will happen to them and they know they can always come back later and say it must a bad source.

These are strategic and so many have been assaulted and harmed due to it. They need to be held accountable.

Here we go again….

http://archive.md/R6yiL

>>7475254

Yep you got it, we have it now, this is correct, I am positive this is how the decodes can truly progress. They gave it to us and we focused on the insult and not the potential cipher/decode. This is it, has to be, guarantee this opens the door. Anyhow glad anons are on it and agree with me, I am beat, until night shift, get it done you SOBs.

BAKER

Attention, all three.

>>7475254

>>7475203

>>7475260

>>7475287

It certainly is. That old non profit that they left up from when he was a Senator provided both the 0 and RN

>>7475238

Yes exactly anon, you got it. It's a simple combination change, there aren't many options, should take an hour to nail them all down. We also need to consider media members as they would be using them as well and.. fuck guys.. we also need to consider potential communication channels as well. They may result in a screenname associated with a gaming site or odd website. This may be the fucking golden ticket right here and we had the shit all this time.

>>7475336

This portion is going to take much more time but if this is what I think it is we may break internal communication patterns (if they exist) by their vocabulary changes. If they use an altered version of the English alphabet it will be very similar to codes several of us have handled in the past on the old chan boards and very possible for us to work out given what we already have. First need to get all the mispellings by both Q and POTUS and match them to conclusion. I do think "Liddle" stands for the kid business we found but it may also indicate he uses that name or has used that name. The net never forgets so if it's out there, we will find it. Fuck! I need to rest and this is too important to step away from, damnit..

>>7475389

And look where it came up, FOIA. So our theory was very likely right, it is used to dodge the FOIA.

>>7475559

Okay this is going to cause a meltdown but - ICQ. Older types will know what this is. Just to note it has nothing to do with the Q movement and has been around since the 90s. However, look at the recent control switches:

1996 - (Clinton) Israel company Mirabilis releases

1998 - (Clinton) AOL (Time Warner)

2010 - (Obama) Digital Sky (Russia) - U1 timeline, projected com potential for HRC/0B

2016 - (Trump takes office/Q shows up) - Guess what? Apache Software githubbed it, Q states that comms are known. Coincidence that Apache does this right around when Q announces com known and explains gaming connection?

Feels like a high potential for it to be this one and I remember that well as it was very popular for private coms at a time when online coms were brand new to the world. Would be a great hiding spot and means to keep all com records off the NSA eyes and offshore.

>>7475653

Shilling can only even have a slight chance to work if there are no specifically related Q posts which point to the very thing. Without that shills like you can call something into question and try to muddy things. In this case though, Q brought it up, other politicians have brought it up, we have hundreds of articles showing it, we have articles showing it with other people. You have literally no chance to sell your bullshit on this one, literally no chance.

>>7475803

I don't think anons are putting it together yet in terms of ownership timelines and world events at those timelines. Sooner or later they will. I know we have bigger fish with the decode at moment so won't push it, they will see it sooner or later.

>>7475812

Calling out for a clipping?

"A white elephant is a possession which its owner cannot dispose of and whose cost, particularly that of maintenance, is out of proportion to its usefulness. In modern usage, it is an object, building project, scheme, business venture, facility, etc., considered expensive but without use or value"

$10 (assumption million)

by Dec 15

Method - Health Care related

Get it done