>>7475195

damn it

>>7475185 (PB)

i don't; just making an observation. this is comfy.

>>7475420

>>7475336

this all reminds me of those ebay typo websites.. surely there is some algorithm or database out there for this type of OCR errors and typos?

OCR Errors

a few links, maybe useful for some of you diggers

http://www.infogridpacific.com/blog/igp-blog-20130317-ocr-production-nightmares.html

https://wiki.epfl.ch/bigdata2015-linguistic-drift-le-temps/ocr-correction

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.0191.pdf

Interesting:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_character_recognition

Commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Information Science Research Institute (ISRI) had the mission to foster the improvement of automated technologies for understanding machine printed documents, and it conducted the most authoritative of the Annual Test of OCR Accuracy from 1992 to 1996.[31]