>>7482833

TYB

You missed a notable, please include in dough - see >>7482720 lb and >>7482794 lb

>>7482841

Shills aplenty, over target.

Pic related, from "battle of the notables" when the site was taken down and relaunched.

>>7482917

Kek says no

>>7483223

100% fuckery. if this were OCR errors then we'd see some instances read correctly and some not. see >>7482720 lb and >>7482794 lb

>>7483422

>>7483337

gov documents are printed then re-scanned and OCRed, presumably to avoid information about redactions etc leaking out.

OCR doesn't do a good job at differentiating between "r-n" and "m" (and some other combinations too).

so the kerning is mostly irrelevant, what's relevant is the frequency of errors and whether the errors change when you re-print and re-OCR a document. we've seen that C-o-m-e-y is never recognized, even though other m's usually are, and that's the part that's damning.

>>7483441

>>7483449

this is wrong, the kerning is irrelevant. see >>7483478

>>7483519

sure. just saying this kerning stuff is wrong and (imo at least) not notable

>>7483523

it's more than that. in the IG report at least, both versions, the ocr is completely blocked from recognizing comey. this would never happen if it was just a dictionary.