>>7483223 (lb)

There has to be another resource (other than the fed gov systems) that have PDFs or Docs scanned in and "seen" by OCR.

Can we find another source for PDFs searchable to see if this "typo/mispelling vs misidentified/comp err"

if other systems that use a similar program to scan files to make them searchable are able to do so with more accuracy than the Official Government Docs… that could be evidence of impropriety or intent to hide names / files

edit cuz im fried potato

>>7483223

There has to be another resource (other than the fed gov systems) that have PDFs or Docs scanned in and "seen" by OCR.

Can we find another source for PDFs searchable to see if this "typo/mispelling vs misidentified/comp err" is common or rare?

If other systems that use a similar program to scan files to make them searchable are able to do so with more accuracy than the Official Government Docs… that could be evidence of impropriety or intent to hide names / files

>>7483223

>>7483518

Incarcerated ETs Twitter feed just gave me an epiphany NEWS PAPERS.

there has to be a way to "scan" [sic] a bunch of digitized old papers, looking for names or common words that may be OCR error prone.

It's hard to tell which OCR tech the news papers might use (tesseract or other) so it may not be direct connection but still would give a scale of how frequent these types of errors occur… esp with a specific name and (in the case of Corney) Never once gets the name correct.